printResearcher’s Independence as a Value and Practice in Scientific Work
Temnitskiy A.L.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Sociological Department, MGIMO University; Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia taleksandr@list.ru
Temnitskiy A.L. Researcher’s Independence as a Value and Practice in Scientific Work. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 6. P. 37-52
The paper uses two repeat studies by Russian scientists (from 2022 and 2024) as examples to examine the contents and features manifesting value- related, organizational and communication aspects of independent research. Considering the study subject, it was important to pinpoint the relationship between the importance of independent research and its actual existence, focus of scientists on independent and team work, absence of regular professional peer communication and their expansion. The function of researcher independence was determined as its correlation with research productivity parameters. Groups of respondents with the greatest potential to distinguish between answers were set up for each aspect of independence. As we found out, differences between diverse ratios of research value and an opportunity for independence largely correlate with employment type, i. e. if scientists work at universities or RAS institutes. The prevailing factor that determines the preference for independent or team research is the study area: nature sciences, exact sciences, engineering or social studies and humanities. The major differentiating factor when it comes to regular contacts with other Russian researchers is academic credentials (candidates vs. doctors of sciences). We have demonstrated that out of the three aspects of researcher independence we have studied, only one (the focus on independent or team research) points to empirical parameters inherent to the concept, i. e. traits characterizing more responsible, rigorous and critical approach and positions to assessing various real or theoretical scenarios. In general, our analysis did not reveal enough to make us confidently say that independence for Russian researchers is a holistic concept that organically encompasses all its aspects, as well, as that independence in itself is a driver of research productivity.
Abramov R. N. (2010) Academic autonomy in the service of intellectuals. Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal]. No. 3: 107–122. (In Russ.)
Chizhevsky A. L. (1995) Na beregu Vselennoj: gody druzhby s Ciolkovskim (vospominaniya) [On the shores of the Universe: years of friendship with Tsiolkovsky (memories)] Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russ.)
Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance. Vol. 16. No. 2: 250–279.
Kasavin I. T. (2022) Scientific creativity as a social phenomenon. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science]. Vol. 59. No. 3: 19–29. DOI: 10.5840/eps202259336. (In Russ.)
Korshunov I. A., Shirkova N. N., Sorokin P. S. (2024) Employers’ request for Employee independence: analysis of vacancies on recruiting sites. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 85–96. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524010085. (In Russ.)
Mitrofanova E. A. (2017) Precarization of labor of scientific and pedagogical workers of higher educational institutions: state and development trends. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual`ny`mi resursami v Rossii [Personnel and intellectual resources management in Russia]. No. 6: 45–48. DOI: 10.12737/article_5a4622605a00e5.69107635. (In Russ.)
New demands on human potential: development of independence (2022). Report to the XXIII Yasinsky (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Nikolsky V. S. (2013) “Academic Freedom” as the Language of Self- Description of the University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia] No. 2: 73–78. (In Russ.)
Popova I. P. (2019) Autonomy in work: a glance at long-term trends. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 10. No. 4: 249–267. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.31.4.619. (In Russ.)
Popova I. P. (2024) Professional autonomy: research directions. INAB. Sovremennye podxody k izucheniyu socialnoj struktury sovremennogo rossijskogo obshhestva [Modern approaches to the study of the social structure of modern Russian society]. No. 2: 31–41. DOI: 10.19181/INAB.2024.2.2. (In Russ.)
Shibarshina S. V. (2022) On the Possibility and Prospects of the Scientific Precariat `pistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science]. Vol. 59. No. 3: 55–60. DOI: 10.5840/eps202259340. (In Russ.)
Shmatko N., Volkova G. (2017) Service or Devotion? Motivation Patterns of Russian Researchers. Forsayt [Foresight]. Vol. 11. No. 2: 54–66. (In Russ.)
Temnitskiy A. L. (2019) The sociocultural phenomenon of independence in Russian citizens’ work in the international aspect of comparison. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 37–49. 10.31857/S013216250005480-1. (In Russ.)
Tsiring D. A., Yakovleva Yu.V., Krylova M. O. (2012) The influence of independence on the success of scientific and pedagogical activity (subject- activity approach). Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. No. 2. (In Russ.) URL: https://science- education.ru/ru/article/view?id=7032 (accessed 15.01.2025).
Vorobyova I. V. (2021) Russian scientists in conditions of precarious employment. Voprosy upravleniya [Management issues]. No. 1: 131–142. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2021-1-131-142. (In Russ.)