«Poaching»: How Companies Fight for Engineering Competencies

«Poaching»:
How Companies Fight for Engineering Competencies


Belova Yu.Yu.

Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Leading Research Fellow, HSE University, Moscow, Russia. ybelova@hse.ru

Shmatko N.A.

Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Chief Research Fellow, Head of Department for Human Capital Research, HSE University, Moscow, Russia. nshmatko@hse.ru

ID of the Article: 10554


This article is implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the HSE University.


For citation:

Belova Yu.Yu., Shmatko N.A. «Poaching»: How Companies Fight for Engineering Competencies. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 6. P. 53-64



Abstract

The paper analyzes the practice of “poaching” engineers by some organizations from others, which is unfolding in the Russian labor market. Using the example of industrial robotics, it shows how companies perceive, interpret and resist such a practice. The struggle for engineers, which arose due to a shortage of qualified personnel, has become a serious challenge for small and medium- sized organizations that do not have sufficient resources to retain employees and resist “personnel poaching” by large companies. Based on interviews with industry experts and heads of industrial robotics companies (N = 54), the paper reveals how relations of dominance and contestation of it are built-in into the economic field at the symbolic level (“projects of shared meanings”) in relation to the struggle for engineering personnel and competencies. The study showed that small companies are forced to recognize the right of large players to poach “alien” engineers, but many of them (“challenger companies”) try to resist the logic of dominance, using symbolic resources and accumulated engineering competencies. “Challengers” are building “their niche”, trying to redefine the distribution of power in the competitive struggle for personnel, including through the formation of shared meanings and self-presentation.


Keywords
engineering competencies; labor market; personnel deficiency; field of economy; technological capital; projects of meanings; self -presentation

References

Бурдье П. Поле экономики // Социальное пространство: поля и практики / Пер. с франц.; отв. ред. перевода, сост. и послесл. Н. А. Шматко. М.: ИЭС; СПб.: Алетейя, 2005. С. 129–176. [Bourdieu P. (2005) Field of Economics. In: Shmatko N. (eds) Social space: Fields and practice. Moscow: IES; St. Petersburg: Alethea: 129–176. (In Russ.)]

Ключарев Г. А. О подготовке инженерных кадров для наукоемких производств (взгляд работодателей) // Социологические исследования. 2020. № 3. С. 51–59. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008820-5.  [Kliucharev G. A. (2020) On the training of engineers for high-tech industries (Employers’ view). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 51–59. (In Russ.)]

Флигстин Н., Макадам Д. Теория полей. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2022. [Fligstein N., Makadam D. (2022) Theory of fields. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)]

Чередниченко Г. А. Инженерная подготовка в структуре высшей школы и профессионального выбора молодежи // Социологические исследования. 2024. № 9. С. 89–99. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524090082. [Cherednichenko G. A. (2024) Engineering training in the structure of higher education and professional choice of youth. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2024. No 9: 89–99. (In Russ.)]

Шматко Н. А. Компетенции инженерных кадров: опыт сравнительного исследования в России и странах ЕС // Форсайт. 2012. Т. 6. № 4. С. 32–47. [Shmatko N. (2012) Competences of engineers: Evidence from a comparative study for Russia and EU countries. Forsait [Foresight- Russia]. Vol. 6. No. 4: 32–47. (In Russ.)]

Acemoglu D., Pischke J.-S. (1998) Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labor Markets. Rochester, NY: SSRN Scholarly Paper.

Becker G. S. (1993) Human Capital: a Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, With Special Reference to Education. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Bourdieu P. (2000) Les Structures Sociales de L’économie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Bourdieu P., de Saint Martin M. (1978) Le patronat. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 20. No. 1: 3–82.

Elfenbein D. W., Hamilton B. H., Zenger T. R. (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Science. Vol. 56. No. 4: 659–681. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1130.

Fligstein N. (2013) Understanding stability and change in fields. Research in Organizational Behavior. No. 33: 39–51. DOI: 10.1016/J.RIOB.2013.10.005.

Gardner T. M. (2002) In the trenches at the talent wars: competitive interaction for scarce human resources. Human Resource Management. Vol. 41. No. 2: 225–237. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.10033.

Mohrenweiser J., Zwick T., Backes‐Gellner U. (2019) Poaching and firm‐sponsored training. British Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol. 57. No. 1: 143–181. DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12305.

Murali S. (2021) Job Specialization and Labor Market Turnover. SSRN Scholarly Paper, Rochester, NY.

Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science. Vol. 49. No. 6: 751–766. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026.

Saraswati J. (2012) Dot.compradors: Power and Policy in the Development of the Indian Software Industry. United Kingdom: Pluto Press, IIPPE.

Shmatko N., Volkova G. (2020). Bridging the skill gap in robotics: global and national environment. Sage Open. Vol. 10. No. 3. 2158244020958736. DOI: 10.1177/2158244020958736.

Stevens M. (1994) A theoretical model of on-the-job training with imperfect competition. Oxford Economic Papers. Vol. 46. No. 4: 537–562.

Zionia A., Sathyapriya J. (2020) Poaching as the apple of an eye in talent acquisition. Our Heritage Journal. Vol. 68. No. 30: 221–226.

Content No 6, 2025