printMyopia after Utopia:
Features of Modern Ideal City Concepts
Grigoreva E.A.
junior researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia yreewda@gmail.com
Grigoreva E.A. Myopia after Utopia: Features of Modern Ideal City Concepts. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 6. P. 65-77
This article examines the evolution of the concept of an ideal city, highlighting its rich social content and the significance of studying these ideas within the context of sociological theory. The ideal city, as a concept, has historically been imbued with bold visions for reorganizing urban spaces, reflecting broader societal values and ideals about social life. Through a comparative historical analysis spanning late 19th to early 21st-century social scientific thought in Russia, Western Europe, and North America, this study reveals significant shifts in how the ideal city is conceptualized. A key finding is that modern conceptions of the ideal city have diminished in their emphasis on social and utopian ideals compared to earlier stages. This reduction poses a challenge for urban planning, as it may lead to environments that are less socially cohesive and equitable. The article argues that this trend is detrimental to the future of urban development, as it overlooks the importance of social organization and community in creating sustainable and desirable cities. In response, the article posits that sociologists have a critical role in reinvigorating the ideal city concept by focusing on the structure of social life. By integrating socio- utopian ideals into urban planning, sociologists can contribute to the creation of more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable urban environments. This approach not only enriches our understanding of social ideals but also informs practical strategies for urban development that prioritize human well-being and community vitality. Ultimately, this research underscores the need for a holistic vision of the ideal city that balances physical infrastructure with social and cultural dimensions.
Bina O., Inch A., Pereira L. (2020) Beyond techno- utopia and its discontents: On the role of utopianism and speculative fiction in shaping alternatives to the smart city imaginary. Futures. Vol. 115: 102475. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475.
Bloch E. (1986) The principle of hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Choay F. (1965) L’Urbanisme, utopies et réalités. Paris: Seuil.
Coleman N. (2005) Utopias and architecture. New York: Routledge.
Dridze T. M. (2000) Eco-anthropocentric Model of Social Cognition as a Way to Overcome the Paradigm Crisis in Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 20–28. (In Russ.)
Durkheim E. (1991) Value and “real” judgments. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 104–114. (In Russ.)
Ferriss H. (1929) The metropolis of tomorrow. New York: Ives Washburn.
Glazychev V. L. (1975) Modern bourgeois culture and the crisis of the social role of the architect. In: Ikonnikov A. V., Glazychev V. L. et al. Architecture of the West. Book 2: Social and ideological problems. Moscow: Stroyizdat: 64–89. (In Russ.)
Greenfield A. (2013) Recuperating the smart city. In: Smart citizens. FutureEverything. Ed. by D. Hemment, A. Townsend. University of Dundee: 9–13.
Grigoreva E. A. (2024) Apology of utopia: On the return of utopian constructs to sociological theorizing. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 139–147. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524040129. (In Russ.)
Grossi G., Pianezzi D. (2017) Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities. No. 69: 79–85.
Gruza I. (1972) Theory of the city. Moscow: Stroyizdat. (In Russ.)
Horkheimer M. (2011) Eclipse of reason: A critique of instrumental reason. Moscow: Canon+; ROOI “Reabilitaciya”. (In Russ.)
Howard E. (1911) Cities of the future. St. Petersburg: Tip. tov-va “Oschestv. polza”. (In Russ.)
Ikonnikov A. V. (2004) Utopian thinking and architecture. Moscow: Arhitektura- S. (In Russ.)
Jacobs J. (2011) The death and life of great American cities. Moscow: Novoe izd-vo.
Jacoby R. (1999) The end of utopia: Politics and culture in an age of apathy. New York: Basic Books.
Mitchell W. J. (1999) E-topia: Urban life, Jim, but not as we know it. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moreno C. (2024) The 15-Minute City: A solution to saving our time and our planet. John Wiley & Sons.
Mumford L. (1922) The story of utopias. New York: Boni and Liveright.
Nepomnyashchy S. V. (2019) Heliotecture – crystallization of the future. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii [Architecture and Construction of Russia]. No. 2: 30–37. (In Russ.)
Peshina E. V., Ryzhenkov A. V. (2013) Evolution of theoretical and methodological approaches to understanding the “ideal city”. Upravlenec [Manager]. Vol. 44. No. 4: 32–40.
Pierre B. (2019) Building the city of the future: Three main tasks. Between urban and new utopia. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Public Service]. Vol. 21. No. 1: 96–99. DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2019-211-96-99. (In Russ.)
Ragon M. (1969) Cities of the future. Moscow: Mir. (In Russ.)
Rosenau H. (1959) The ideal city in its architectural evolution. London: Routledge and Paul.
Soleri P. (1987) Arcosanti: An urban laboratory? Santa Monica, CA: VTI Press.
Solinís G. (2006) Utopia, the origins and invention of Western urban design. Diogenes. Vol. 53. No. 1: 79–87.
Sorokin P. A., Zimmerman C. C. (1969) Principles of rural- urban sociology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Tafuri M. (1973) Architecture and utopia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Valdez A. M., Cook M., Potter S. (2018) Roadmaps to utopia: Tales of the smart city. Urban Studies. Vol. 55. No. 15: 3385–3403.
Vershinina I. A., Kurbatov A. R. (2020) Brasilia: A realized utopia, but an unfulfilled dream? Latinskaya Amerika [Latin America]. No. 4: 86–96. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0008710-0. (In Russ.)
Windsor- Liscombe R. (2004) The ideal city. A discussion paper in preparation for the World Urban Forum 2006. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and the University of British Columbia.
Wright F. L. (2018) The disappearing city. Moscow: Strelka Press. (In Russ.)
Yanitsky O. N. (2018) Creating a model of the ideal city. Koevolyuciya i noosfera: issledovaniya, analitika, prognozirovanie [Co-evolution and Noosphere: Research, Analytics, Forecasting]. Vol. 4. No. 6: 5–25. (In Russ.)
Yanitsky O. N. (2018) The ideal city as a symbol of the future. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya [Russia: Trends and Prospects of Development]. No. 13–1: 1107–1113. (In Russ.)
Yanitsky O. N. (2019) The “ideal city”, its statics and dynamics. Vestnik BFU im. I. Kanta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Bulletin of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Ser.: Humanities and Social Sciences]. No. 1: 43–58. (In Russ.)