printAnti- Immigrant Attitudes in Europe:
Formal Education as a Moderator of Material and Symbolic Predictors
Parvadov S.O.
Postgraduate student, School of Computational Social Sciences of the European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia. sparvadov@eu.spb.ru
Tenisheva K.A.
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., School of Computational Social Sciences of the European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia. ktenisheva@eu.spb.ru
Parvadov S.O., Tenisheva K.A. Anti- Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Formal Education as a Moderator of Material and Symbolic Predictors. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 7. P. 135-146
This article examines how the level of formal education moderates the relationship between material and symbolic predictors and anti-immigrant attitudes at the individual level. The theoretical framework of the study is group threat theory. Material predictors are the respondents’ income and labor market status. Ethnic and civic identity, individual religiosity, generalized trust are considered as symbolic predictors. The empirical material was survey data from the last fifth wave of the European Values Study (EVS2017) in 30 countries (total final sample size N = 26873) collected between 2017 and 2022. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to construct the dependent variable and key predictors. The main method of the study was multilevel regression modeling followed by moderation analysis. Based on regional differences in attitudes towards immigrants, the sample is divided into two groups: Eastern and Western Europe. Interactions of respondents’ formal education with civic identity and income variables for both subsamples, and with individual religiosity and generalized trust variables for Eastern Europe showed statistical significance. Higher education is associated with more positive attitudes toward immigrants in Eastern and Western Europe, regardless of respondents’ income, suggesting support for the liberalizing effect of higher education across varying socioeconomic status. Regional differences in the moderations of civic identity and individual religiosity require further clarification. In Eastern Europe, education reinforces the effect of generalized trust on anti-immigrant attitudes. No such relationship was found in Western Europe.
Воронина Н. С. Динамика установок россиян по отношению к иммигрантам: результаты анализа данных Европейского социального исследования за 2006–2021 гг. // Социологические исследования. 2024. № 8. С. 61–78. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524080059. [Voronina N. S. (2024) Dynamics of Russians’ Attitudes towards Immigrants: Results of the Analysis of European Social Survey Data for 2006–2021. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 61–78 (In Russ.)]
Мастикова Н. С., Фадеев П. В. Кто настроен против иммигрантов в России? Анализ некоторых социально- демографических характеристик // Вестник Института социологии. 2020. Т. 11. № 4. С. 99–125. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2020.11.4.681. [Mastikova N. S., Fadeev P. V. (2020) Who is set against migrants in Russia? Analyzing certain socio- demographic characteristics. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 11. No 4: 99–125 (In Russ.)]
Монусова Г. А. Отношение к мигрантам: мнения и сомнения россиян // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021. № 6. С. 436–458. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2139. [Monusova G. A. (2021) Russians’ Attitudes Towards Migrants: Opinions and Doubts. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No 6: 436–458 (In Russ.)]
Allport G. (1958) The Nature of Prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Bell D. A., Valenta M., Strabac Z. (2021) A comparative analysis of changes in anti-immigrant and anti- Muslim attitudes in Europe: 1990–2017. CMS. Vol. 9. No 57: 1–24. DOI: 10.1186/s40878–021–00266-w.
BenNun Bloom P., Arikan G., Courtemanche M. (2015) Religious Social Identity, Religious Belief, and Anti- Immigration Sentiment. American Political Science Review. Vol. 109. No. 2: 203–221. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055415000143.
Blumer H. (1958) Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. The Pacific Sociological Review. Vol. 1. No. 1: 3–7.
Brubaker R. (2017) Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Vol. 40. No. 8: 1191–1226. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700.
Coenders M., Scheepers P. (2003) The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison. Political Psychology. Vol. 24. No. 2: 313–343. DOI: 10.1111/0162–895X.00330.
van der Heijden E., Verkuyten M. (2020) Educational Attainment, Political Sophistication and Anti- Immigrant Attitudes. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. Vol. 8. No. 2: 600–616. DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1334.
Hello E., Scheepers P., Gijsberts M. (2002) Education and ethnic prejudice in Europe: explanations for cross- national variances in the educational effect on ethnic prejudice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 46. No. 1: 5–24. DOI: 10.1080/00313830120115589.
Jenssen A. T., Engesbak H. (1994) The Many Faces of Education: why are people with lower education more hostile towards immigrants than people with higher education? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 38. No 1: 33–50. DOI: 10.1080/0031383940380103.
Lancee B., Sarrasin O. (2015) Educated Preferences or Selection Effects? A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Educational Attainment on Attitudes Towards Immigrants. European Sociological Review. Vol. 31. No. 4: 490–501. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcv008.
LeVine R.A., Campbell D. T. (1972) Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
Manevska K., Achterberg P. (2011) Immigration and Perceived Ethnic Threat: Cultural Capital and Economic Explanations. European Sociological Review. Vol. 29. No. 3: 437–449. DOI:10.1093/esr/jcr085.
Oberpriller J., de Souza Leite M., Pichler M. (2022) Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed- effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables. Ecology and Evolution. Vol. 12. No. 7: 1–15. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9062.
Rios K., Sosa N., Osborn H. (2018) An experimental approach to Intergroup Threat Theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology. Vol. 29. No. 1: 212–255. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049.
Rustenbach E. (2010) Sources of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Europe: A multi- level analysis. International migration review. Vol. 44. No 1: 53–77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00798.x.
Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In: Worchel S., Austin W. (eds). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson- Half.
Umansky K., Weber D., Lutz W. (2025) Revisiting the Role of Education in Attitudes toward Immigration in Different Contexts in Europe. Genus. Vol. 81. No. 1: 1–27. DOI: 10.1186/s41118-024-00238-9.
Velásquez P., Eger M. A. (2022) Does higher education have liberalizing or inoculating effects? A panel study of anti-immigrant sentiment before, during, and after the European migration crisis. European Sociological Review. Vol. 38. No. 4: 605–628. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcab062.
Weber H. (2020) The educational divide over feelings about ethnic minorities: does more education really lead to less prejudice? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Vol. 48. No. 1: 228–247. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1810540.