printLabor Transformation:
Genesis of a New Social System? (comments on a discussion)
Yakovleva N.G.
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Leading Researcher at the Center for Institutes of Socio- Economic Development of the Institute of Economics of RAS; Assoc. Prof. at the Scientific and Educational Center for Contemporary Marxist Studies, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov MSU; Director of the A. V. Buzgalin Institute of Socio- Economics, Moscow Finance and Law University MFUA Moscow, Russia tetn@yandex.ru
Barashkova O.V.
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Research Fellow at the Laboratory for Comparative Research of Socio-Economic Systems, Faculty of Economics; Senior Lecturer of the Scientific and Educational Center for Contemporary Marxist Studies, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov MSU; Researcher of the A. V. Buzgalin Institute of Socio-Economics, Moscow Finance and Law University MFUA Moscow, Russia olga_barashkova@mail.ru
This article was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 23-18-00508.
Yakovleva N.G., Barashkova O.V. Labor Transformation: Genesis of a New Social System? (comments on a discussion). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 8. P. 53-64
The article presents the key points of the discussion on the problems of labor transformation and diffusion of social structure at the current stage of development of the capitalist social system. The discussion was interdisciplinary in nature, with the participation of representatives of sociological and economic science from the institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences and leading universities. The initial formulation of the problems for discussion included the results of the analysis of contradictions indicating the formation of elements of a new system of social relations within capitalism (transitional relations), which can be called post-capitalist. The results of the discussion of the following issues are covered in detail: should creative activity be considered primarily a characteristic of the social- class structure, or does this relate to a greater extent to the spiritual world of a person; the problems of the precariat as a new social stratum (protoclass), its distinctive characteristics and the problem of its heterogeneity; peculiarities of the exploitation of a creative worker. The discussion also included questions about the appropriateness of using the terms “diffusion” or “differentiation” in the context of the ongoing transformation of the social structure and the increasing role of the creative nature of labour, and the problem of how new social strata (protoclasses) can be considered as bearers of liberating tendencies aimed at overcoming alienation. An important place in the discussion was given to the problem of theoretical qualification of the modern social system, in particular, arguments were presented in favor of defining it not as “late capitalism” (which is quite widespread in scientific discourse at the moment), but as “early postcapitalism”.
Buzgalin A. V. (2023) After the “End of History”: Progressive Alternatives to the Refeudalization and “Techno- Socialism”. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 163–172. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250028547-4. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2019) Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism: from Proletariat and Bourgeoisie Towards Precariat and Creative Class? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 1: 18–28. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003744-1. (In Russ.)
Epstein D. B. (2024) About socialism of the XXIst century (reflections on the article by E. V. Krasnikova). Alternativy [Alternatives]. No. 4: 125–140. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14781163. (In Russ.)
Gloveli G. D. (2008) Historical- stadial and evolutionary concepts in Russian economic thought: century retrospective. (Series: Scientific Reports of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Theoretical Economics.) Moscow: IE RAN. (In Russ.)
Ivanov D. V. (2000) Virtualisation of society. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Oriental Studies. (In Russ.)
King B., Petty R. (2021) The Rise of Technosocialism: How Inequality, AI and Climate Will Usher in a New World. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
Kolganov A. I. (2025) The Diffusion of the Social Structure of Modern Capitalism as a Reflection of the Post- Capitalist Tendencies Formation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 132– 144. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162525030119. (In Russ.)
Kotkin J. (2020) The Coming of Neo- Feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class. New York: Encounter Books.
Kotz D. M. (2015) The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latov Yu.V. (2024) Concepts and Empirics of the Formation of a Post- Capitalist “Creative Class” (Class of Professionals). Voprosy politicheskoi ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No 2: 75–89. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12622452. (In Russ.)
Life world of workers: sustainability versus precarity. (2024) Ed. by Zh. T. Toshchenko. Moscow: Ves’ Mir. (In Russ.)
Mandel E. (1987) Late Capitalism. London; New York: Verso.
Tolkachev S. A., Sokolov D. P. (2020) Maker Movement as “the System of Civilized Cooperators” in the Age of New Industrial Revolution. Voprosy politicheskoi ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 4: 119–134. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4422785. (In Russ.)