printConflict of National Images of World War II in the Context of Sociology of World Wars
Latov Yu.V.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia latov@mail.ru
Latov Yu.V. Conflict of National Images of World War II in the Context of Sociology of World Wars. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 9. P. 115-128
The article presents a macrosociological approach to understanding world wars based on the world-system paradigm of social science in the form of a scientific essay. It supports the controversial thesis that in the history of modern and contemporary times there have been not two world wars, but significantly more. It is proposed to call world wars armed conflicts that are waged on a planetary scale, are characterized by large scales and, most importantly, have a strong influence on global world history. With this approach, the Thirty Years’ War of the 17th century can be considered the “Zero” World War, and the events associated with the Central Military District in Ukraine can be considered the “Third”. These conflicts occur periodically, since they are caused by the power competition of nation-states for leadership in the core of the modern world system. Russia’s increasing participation in these global conflicts, aimed at increasing its geopolitical independence, is due to the paradoxical combination from the 18th century to the present day of its economic backwardness from the West with high military force. This approach allows us to reject the opinion that World War II was supposedly a manifestation of a centuries-long conflict between Russia and the West, since in this, as in previous world wars, Russia fought against some Western countries in alliance with others. An overview of the strong differences in the memory of World War II in Russia, China and the West is given: all national images of history have deviations from the “academic” historical reality, but in different aspects. The world-system approach allows us to explain the modern struggle against the “falsification of World War II” as a clash of different national versions (images) of history, the differences between which are mainly not opportunistic, but objectively determined – in particular, a certain “bias” of all national versions of historical memory and its different significance in different countries-civilizations.
60th anniversary of Victory: Europeans on World War II. (2005) VTsIOM. April 28. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/60‑letie-pobedy-evropejczy-o-vtoroj-mirovoj-vojne (accessed04.07.2025). (In Russ.)
Bezotosny V. M. (2023) Historical Landscape of the Napoleonic Wars. World Conflict and Clash of Empires. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole, IKS-HISTORY. (In Russ.)
Chase-Dunn Ch.K., Podobnik B. (1995) The Next World War: World-System Cycles and Trends. Journal of World Systems Research. Vol. 1. Iss. 1: 295–326.
Collins R. (2025) Violence. Microsociological Theory. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
Falsification of the History of the Great Patriotic War: List of Articles. (2020) Kurgan. (In Russ.)
Goldstein J. S. (1988) Long Cycles. Prosperity and War in the Modern Age. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
Gorshkov M. K., Barash R. E. (2024) Historical Memory of Modern Russians (the History of Russia in the Twentieth Century through the Prism of Family Histories). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 125–137. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524090119. (In Russ.)
Hamilton R. F., Herwig H. H. (2003) World Wars: Definition and Causes. In: The Origins of World War I. Ch. 1. Cambridge Univesity Press: 1–44.
Karachkova E.Yu. (2013) Dialogues with the Past. Ethnohistory of the Rajput Principality. Moscow: Sovpadenie. (In Russ.)
Kennedy P. (2018) Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Changes and Military Conflicts in the Formation of World Centers of Power from 1500 to 2000. Yekaterinburg: Gonzo. (In Russ.)
Le Goff J. (2010) The History of Europe Told to Children. Moscow: Text. (In Russ.)Lederer E. (1915) Zur Soziologie des Weltkriegs. Archiv für Sozialwisseschaft und Sozialpolitik. B. 39. No. 2: 347–384. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328508518_On_the_Sociology_of_World_War (accessed 04.07.2025).
Mikaberidze A. (2020) The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History. Oxford.
Obraztsov I. V. (2020) War as an Object of Sociological Analysis. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 106–116. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010207‑0. (In Russ.)
Puzanova Zh.V., Narbut N. P., Larina T. I., Tertyshnikova A. G. (2020) Typology of Historical Memory of World War II: Methodological Aspects of the Study (on the Example of RUDN Students). Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 2: 292–306. (In Russ.)
Russians on World War II: Causes, Allies, Opponents. (2019) VTsIOM. August 29. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/rossiyane-o-vtoroj-mirovoj-vojne-prichiny-soyuzniki-protivniki (accessed 04.07.2025). (In Russ.)
Turitsyn I. V. (2022) The Phenomenon of World Wars: Towards a General Formulation of the Scientific Problem. In: Global conflict and world wars: history and modernity. Moscow: ANO “NIIIEP”: 3–17. (In Russ.)
Wallerstein I. (2003) Decline of American Power: The U. S. in a Chaotic World. New Press.
Wallerstein I. (2006) World-System Analysis: Introduction. Moscow: Territoriya buduschego. (In Russ.)
World War II: What Do We Know About It? (2009) VTsIOM. August 31. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/vtoraya-mirovaya-vojna-chto-my-o-nej-znaem (accessed 04.07.2025). (In Russ.)
World War II: What We Remember, What We Forgot. (2020) VTsIOM. September 2. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/vtoraya-mirovaya-chto-pomnim-o-chem-zabyli (accessed 04.07.2025). (In Russ.)
White H. (2024) The Practical Past. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)