Zoontology as a Field of Research:
a Sociological Perspective
Кaterniy I.V.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof. of the Department of Sociology, MGIMO University; Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. yarkus@mail.ru
Morozov M.A.
Postgraduate Student, Department of Sociology, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia. mikhail.mo@mail.ru
Кaterniy I.V., Morozov M.A. Zoontology as a Field of Research: a Sociological Perspective. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 10. P. 52-64
The paper examines development of the sociological perspective within animal studies, particularly focusing on issues of social zoontology, including the status, role and functions of animals in human society. From George H. Mead’s idea of the symbolic gap between animals and humans, sociology has evolved to a more sophisticated analysis of complex and diverse connections within interspecies communications. At the same time, the lack of clarity of the very concept of zoontology and embarrassing, inherently ambivalent position of animals “on the threshold” of human society make us talk about the permanent liminality of the ‘zoological structures’ of human sociality, resulting with a range of inconsistencies of social recognition. Ethical and legal patterns of humane zoontology are highlighted. The issues of ontological attribution, personhood (subjectivity) and normative strain in interspecies communications, including child and adolescent cruelty to animals during socialization, are analyzed in more detail.
Давыдов Ю. Н. Определяя «общество»: от истории понятия к уточнению концептуальных границ // Электронный журнал «Социологический форум». 1998. Т. 1. № 1. URL: http://www.sociology.ru/forum/98-1davidov-an.html (дата обращения: 15.05.2010) [Davydov Yu.N. (1998) Defining “society”: from the history of the concept to the clarification of conceptual boundaries. E-journal “Sociological Forum”. Vol. 1. No. 1. URL: http://www. sociology.ru/forum/98-1davidov-an.html (accessed 15.05.10). (In Russ.)]
Васильев C. С. Защита прав и правосубъектность животных // Animal law. 2020. № 1. С. 16–25 [Vasiliev S. S. (2020) Animal rights and legal personality. Animal Law. No 1: 16–25 (In Russ.)]
Волкова И. В. Отношение к животным и буллинг у подростков // Социальная психология и общество. 2021. Т. 12. № 2. C. 183–196 [Volkova I. V. (2021) Attitudes to animals and bullying among teenagers. Socialnaya psihologiya i obshhestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. Vol. 12. No. 2: 183–196 (In Russ.)]
Деррида Ж. Животное, которым я следовательно являюсь // Социология власти. 2019. Т. 3. № 31. С. 220–275. [Derrida J. (2019) L’Animal que donc je suis. Sociologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power]. Vol. 3. No. 31: 220–275 (In Russ.)]
ван Геннеп А. Обряды перехода. Систематическое изучение обрядов / Пер. с фр. М.: Вост. лит-ра РАН, 1999 [van Gennep A. (1999) The Rites of Passages. Moscow: Vost. lit-ra RAN (In Russ.)]
Гофман И. Анализ фреймов: эссе об организации повседневного опыта / Пер. с англ. М.: ИС РАН, 2003 [Goffman E. (2003) Frame Analysis. An Essay on Organization of Experience. Moscow: IS RAN (In Russ.)]
Леопольд О. Календарь песчаного графства / Пер. с англ. М.: Мир, 1983 [Leopold O. (1983) A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Moscow: Mir (In Russ.)]
Локк Дж. Мысли о воспитании // Соч. в 3‑х тт. М.: Мысль, 1988. Т. 3. С. 407–614 [Locke J. (1988) Some thoughts concerning education. Works of John Locke in 3 vol. Moscow: Mysl`. Vol. 3: 407–614. (In Russ.)]
Сингер П. Освобождение животных / Пер. с англ. Киев: КЭКЦ, 2002 [Singer P. (2002) Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. Kyev: KEKC (In Russ.)]
Alger J. M., Alger S. F. (1997) Beyond Mead: Symbolic interaction between humans and felines. Society & Animals. Vol. 5. No.1: 65–81.
Alger J. M., Alger S. F. (1999) Cat culture, human culture: An ethnographic study of a cat shelter. Society & Animals Vol. 7. No. 3: 199–218.
Anderson J. R., Gallup G. G. (2015) Mirror self-recognition: a review and critique of attempts to promote and engineer self-recognition in primates. Primates. Vol. 56(4): 317–326. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-015-0488-9.
Animal Protection Index (n/d). World Animal Protection. URL: https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/(accessed 21.06.25).
Arluke A. (1987). Reasons for sociological study of animal research: The experimenter as guinea pig. Bulletin of Psychologists for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Vol. 6(20): 8–9.Arluke A., Sax B. (1992) Understanding Nazi animal protection and the Holocaust. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals. Vol. 5. No 1: 6–31.
DOI:10.2752/089279392787011638.
Arluke A. (2002) Animal abuse as dirty play. Symbolic Interaction. Vol. 25(4): 405–430. DOI: 10.1525/si.2002.25.4.405.
Arluke A. (2006) Just a Dog: Understanding Animal Cruelty and Ourselves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bain R. (1928) The culture of canines. A note on subhuman sociology. Sociology and Social Research. No. 13: 545–556.
Baldry A. C. (2003) Animal abuse and exposure to interparental violence in Italian youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Vol. 18(3): 258–281. DOI: 10.1177/0886260502250081.
Bryant C. D. (1979) The zoological connection: Animal-related human behavior. Social Forces. Vol. 58. No. 2: 399–421.
Callicott J. B. (1987). The conceptual foundations of the land ethic. Companion to A Sand County Almanac. Ed. by J. B. Callicott. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press: 186–217.
Case C. M. (1927) Culture as a distinctive human trait. The American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 32. No. 6: 906–920.
Connor M., Currie C., Lawrence A. (2018). Factors influencing the prevalence of animal cruelty during adolescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Vol. 36(7–8): 3017–3040. DOI: 10.1177/0886260518771684.
Dent A. (1974) The Horse Through Fifty Centuries of Civilization. Milan: Phaidon Press Ltd. Ecodefence: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching (1993). Ed. by D. Foreman, B. Haywood. Chico: Abbsug Press.
Fine G. A. (1986) The dirty play of little boys. Society. Vol. 24(1): 63–67. DOI: 10.1007/BF02695941.
Flynn C. P. (2000) Why family professionals can no longer ignore violence toward animals. Family Relations. Vol. 49. No.1: 87–95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741–3729.2000.00087.x.
Geertz C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Hart H., Pantzer A. (1925) Have subhuman animals culture? American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 30: 703–709.
Henry B. C. (2004). The relationship between animal cruelty, delinquency, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals. Society & Animals Vol. 12(3): 185–207. DOI: 10.1163/1568530042880677.
Levinson B. M. (1969) Pet-Oriented Child Psychotherapy. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas.
Lopez B. H. (1978) Of Wolves and Men. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
Lucia S., Killias M. (2011) Is animal cruelty a marker of interpersonal violence and delinquency? Results of a Swiss national self-report study. Psychology of Violence. Vol. 1(2): 93–105. DOI: 10.1037/a0022986.
Macdonald J. M. (1963) The threat to kill. American Journal of Psychiatry. Vol. 120(2): 125–130.
McClellan J. (2007) Animal cruelty and violent behavior: Is there a connection? Journal of Security Education. Vol. 2(4): 29–45. DOI: 10.1300/J460v02n04_04.
Mead G. H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Naess A. (1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry. Vol. 16. No. 1: 95–100.
Patterson-Kane E.G., Piper H. (2009) Animal abuse as a sentinel for human violence: A critique. Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 65(3): 589–614. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01615.x.
Phillips M. (1994) Proper names and the social construction of biography: The negative case of laboratory animals. Qualitative Sociology. Vol. 17(2): 119–142. DOI: 10.1007/BF02393497.
Robins D. M., Sanders C. R., Cahill S. E. (1991) Dogs and their people: Pet-facilitated interaction in a public setting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Vol. 20. No.1: 3–25. DOI: 10.1177/089124191020001001.
Ryder R. (2000) Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Sanders C. R. (1993). Understanding dogs: Caretakers’ attributions of mindedness in canine–human relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Vol. 22(2): 205–226. DOI: 10.1177/089124193022002003.
Sanders C. R. (2003) Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction. Vol. 26(3): 405–426. DOI: 10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405.
Sax B. (2000) Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust. New York: Continuum.
Singer P. (1999) Practical Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tallichet S. E., Hensley C. (2004) Exploring the link between recurrent acts of childhood and adolescent animal cruelty and subsequent violent crime. Criminal Justice Review. Vol. 29(2): 304–316. DOI: 10.1177/073401680402900203.
The New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness (2024). New York University, April 19th. URL: nydeclaration.com (accessed 30.05.24).
Zinsser H. (1935) Rats, Lice, and History. London: George Routledge & Sons.


print