printThe Role of Professional Education in Youth Adaptation:
Perception Dynamics
Popova E.S.
Cand. Sci. (Soc.), leading researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia espopova@isras.ru
The study is supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project № 25-28-01014).
Popova E.S. The Role of Professional Education in Youth Adaptation: Perception Dynamics. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 10. P. 65-79
The degree of youth adaptability, understood as the ability of young people to integrate into social institutions, particularly the sphere of education, varies significantly within the context of educational stratification. The article analyzes the dynamics of perceptions regarding the role of education as a success criterion based on materials from the all-Russian monitoring conducted by the Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS (data 2016–2024). The study identifies qualitative differences in adaptation strategies among youth subgroups and proposes a typology of adaptation strategies. Specifically, the research reveals the scale and possible reasons for the socio-cultural devaluation of higher professional education by the most educated part of the youth. The study discovers similarities in socio-psychological adaptation mechanisms between youth without professional education and those with higher education. The research highlights the stability of adaptation behavior among mid-level specialists, which may be related to both the specifics of blue-collar human capital and the height of institutional barriers in achieving desired goals. The most significant temporal markers in the studied period were 2020 and 2022. The first stage of the studied period was characterized by a sharp increase in the proportion of well-adapted young people with higher education, indicating an increased adaptive capacity of this group to changes. The lag in adaptation among the mid-level specialists group indicates the need for further study of factors influencing the adaptation potential of this category of youth. A significant trend was observed in the group without professional education, where there was an increase in the proportion of moderately adapted young people at the expense of poorly adapted ones. This may indicate the presence of internal adaptation resources even in the absence of formal professional education. By 2024, a trend towards stabilization of adaptability indicators was identified. The reduction of the poorly adapted group across all educational subgroups suggests a process of redistribution of adaptation resources.
Barg K. (2015) Educational Choice and Cultural Capital through the Lens of Social Stratification. Sociology. Vol. 49. No. 6: 1113–1132.
Bourdieu P., Passeron J.-C. (2007) Reproduction: Elements of the Theory of Educational System. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. (In Russ.)
Buchmann M., Kriesi I. (2011) Transition to Adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 37: 481–503.
Chernysh М. F. (2021). The Institutional Foundations of Inequality in Modern Society. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. Vol. 30. No. 3: 6–28. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X‑2021-30-3-6-28. (In Russ.)
Coleman J. S. (1981) The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of Adolescents and Its Impact on Education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Education Indicators. (2025) National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Entwistle D. R., Alexander K. L. (1993) Beginning School Behavior and Educational Disparities Among American Children. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 19: 401–423.
Gerber T. P. (2000) Problems of Educational Stratification in Contemporary Russia. Sociology of Education. Vol. 73. No. 4: 219–246.
Gimpelson V. E., Kapelyushnikov R. I., Lukyanova A. L. (2010) The Level of Education of Russian Workers: Optimal, Excessive or Insufficient? Preprint WP3/2010/03. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
Russian Society and the Challenges of Time. (2025) Еd. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova. Book 8. Moscow: Ves’ Mir. (In Russ.)Hogan D. P., Astone N. M. (1986) Transition to Adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 12: 109–130.
Hollingshead A. B. (2007) Elmtown’s Youth – The Impact Of Social Classes On Adolescents. Case Pr.
Hwan K. D. (2005) The Role of Social Capital in Educational Inequalities. Development and Society. Vol. 34. No. 1: 147–167.
Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2021) Returns to Education in Russia: As Low as It Can Get? Working Paper Series WP3 «Labour Market Issues». Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Konstantinovskiy D. L., Popova E. S. (2022). From the Perception of Social Changes towards Social Behavior Change. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology / Ethnology]. Vol. 31. No. 1: 6–24. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X‑2022-31-1-6-24. (In Russ.)
Popova E. S. (2024) Plans and Reality in The Horizon of The Future: Towards The Issue of Conceptualization in the Analysis of Social Behavior. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. Vol. 12. No. 4: 106–123. DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2024.12.4.6. (In Russ.)
Radaev V. V. (2019) Millennials: How the Russian Society Changes. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Russian Youth Across Decades. (2017) Еd. by D.L Konstantinovsky, G. A. Cherednichenko. Moscow: IS RAN. (In Russ.)
Schneider B. A. (2001) Educational Stratification and the Life Course. Sociological Focus. Vol. 34. No. 4: 463–466.
Shavit Y., Wösterbäcker K. (1998) Reforms and Expansion of Higher Education Opportunities in Italy. European Sociological Review. Vol. 14. No. 1: 33–47.
Sushko P. E. (2023) Social Well-being and Social Success of Russian Youth. Nauka. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo [Science. Culture. Society]. Vol. 29. No. 3: 136–149. DOI: 10.19181/nko.2023.29.3.8. (In Russ.)
Tikhonova N. E. (2018) Life Success and Social Status Factors in the Minds of Russians. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 9. No. 4: 11–43. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.27.4.536. (In Russ.)
Tikhonova N. E. (2025) Life Success: What Does it Mean for Russians? Voprosi teoreticheskoi ekonomiki. [Issues of Economic Theory]. 2025. No. 1 (26): 93–112. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2025_1_93_112. (In Russ.)
Vozmitel A. A. (2021) Objective and Subjective Characteristics of the Success of Post-Soviet Youth. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 12. No. 4: 67–86. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2021.12.4.751. (In Russ.)
Zubok J. А. (2020) Youth: Life Strategies in a New Reality. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnie peremeni [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. Vol. 3: 4–12. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1688. (In Russ.)
Zubok J. A., Chuprov V. I. (2020) Youth’s Activity in Changing Reality: Self-Regulation Contradictions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnie peremeni: fakti, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. Vol. 13. No. 6: 215–231. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.13. (In Russ.)
Zudina A. A. (2024) ’Lockdown Generation’: Youth Labor Market Dynamics During the COVID‑19 Pandemic. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. Vol. 33. No. 2: 6–31. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X‑2024-33-2-6-31. (In Russ.)