Freelancers’ Professional Activities under the Influence of Artificial Intelligence
Strebkov D.O.
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Economic and Sociological Studies; Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Economic Sociology, HSE University, Moscow, Russia strebkov@hse.ru
Support from the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is gratefully acknowledged
Strebkov D.O. Freelancers’ Professional Activities under the Influence of Artificial Intelligence. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 2. P. 35-47
The article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the professional activities of Russian-speaking freelancers engaged in creative and intellectual fields. Based on data from online surveys conducted in 2024 and 2025 on the platform Freelance.ru, the research reveals the dynamics of AI usage, the primary tasks assigned to neural networks, and the advantages and limitations of their application. In particular, it was shown that over the past year, the proportion of people using AI to solve professional problems has grown significantly, and assessments of its capabilities have become more positive. Particular attention is paid to the key skills necessary for effective collaboration with AI, such as formulating prompts, assessing the quality of results, and minimizing potential errors. The study considers both the positive aspects of using neural networks and the challenges it presents, including quality instability and ethical issues associated with technology use. In conclusion, the perspectives on the transformation of professional employment and the influence of AI on the labor market structure are discussed.
Demirci O., Hannane J., Zhu X. (2025) Who Is AI Replacing? The Impact of Generative AI on Online Freelancing Platforms. Management Science. No. 71(10): 8097–8993. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2024.05420.
Grinin L. E., Grinin A. L., Grinin I. L. (2023) Artificial Intelligence: Development and Concerns. A Look into the Future. Article two. Artificial Intelligence: Terra Incognita or a Controlled Force? Filosofia i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 4: 5–32. DOI: 10.30884/jfio/2023.04.01; EDN: RVZOFX. (In Russ.)
Klimovich A. P. (2021) Risky Concentration of Power in the Age of AI: Between Surveillance Capitalism and Digital Leviathan. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie o socialnye peremeni [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1: 154–170. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1784; EDN: UPTCFG (In Russ.)
Klowait N. Erofeeva M. (2019) Work in the Age of Intelligent Machines: The Rise of Invisible Automation. Logos [Logos]. No. 29 (1): 53–84. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2019-1-53-80; EDN: YYKMXR. (In Russ.)
Levashov V. K., Grebnyak O. V. (2024) Expansion of Artificial Intelligence: Expectations and Attitudes of Citizen. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 13–23. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524120022; EDN: XMNDBL. (In Russ.)
Martynenko T. S., Dobrinskaya D. E. (2021) Social Inequality in the Age of Algorithms: From Digital to Algorithmic Divide. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie o socialnye peremeni [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1: 171–192. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1807; EDN: ZMNKKY. (In Russ.)
Mukhina O. S., Oleshko V. F. (2025) Pragmatics of Artificial Intelligence: Freelance Journalists Re shape the Approach to Rewriting. Vestnik NGU. Istoriya, filologiya [Bulletin of NSU. History, Philology]. No. 24(6): 32–43. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-6-32-43; EDN: TIOJVW. (In Russ.)
Öztaş Y. E., Arda B. (2025) Re-evaluating Creative Labor in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Qualitative Case Study of Creative Workers’ Perspectives on Technological Transformation in Creative Industries. AI & Society. No. 40(5): 4119–4130. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02180-6.
Rezaev A. V., Starikov V S., Tregubova N. D. (2020) Sociology in the Era of “Artificial Sociality”: Searching for New Foundations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 3–12. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008489-0; EDN: ZMUOZB. (In Russ.)
Sætra H. S. (2023) Generative AI: Here to Stay, but for Good? Technology in Society. No. 75: 102372. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102372.
Shmerlina I. A. (2024) Artificial Sociality in the Light of Old and New Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 5–14. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524010016; EDN: KREZAG. (In Russ.)
Sinlapanuntakul P., Zachry M. (2025) Impacts of AI on Human Designers: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. No. 68(3): 264–283. DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2025.3588655.
Skorobogatov A. S., Sviridov O. I. (2025) The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on the Structure and Content of Job Vacancies in the Russian Labor Market. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 1: 71–91. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-1-71-91; EDN: IUBBUP. (In Russ.)
Strebkov D. O. (2024) The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Industries: Fears and Concerns of Freelancers. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 10: 110–127. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-110-127; EDN: ALJSCY. (In Russ.)
Strebkov D. O., Shevchuk A. V. (2022) What Do We Know About Freelancers? Sociology of Freelance Employment. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Teutloff O. et al. (2025) Winners and Losers of Generative AI: Early Evidence of Shifts in Freelancer Demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. No. 235: 106845.
Tomlinson K. et al. (2025) Working with AI: Measuring the Occupational Implications of Generative AI. arXiv.2507.07935. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.07935.
Vicsek L., Pinter R., Bauer Z. (2025) Shifting Job Expectations in the Era of Generative AI Hype – Perspectives of Journalists and Copywriters. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. No. 45 (1/2): 1–16. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP‑05-2024-0231.
Yakovenko A. V. (2024) Man and Society Through the Prism of Artificial Intelligence. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 135–144. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524030113; EDN: SUBBVA. (In Russ.)


print