Forms of Youth Creativity in the North Caucasus: Cases of Nalchik and Pyatigorsk

Forms of Youth Creativity in the North Caucasus:
Cases of Nalchik and Pyatigorsk


Kuziner E.N.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Research Fellow, Center for Youth Studies, HSE University – St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia ekuziner@hse.ru

Solovyova N.S.

PhD Student, Junior Research Fellow of the same Center, HSE University – St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia nchernisheva@hse.ru

ID of the Article: 10858


This research was carried out within the project of the Centre for Youth Studies “Resilience and Creative Potential of Youth in the North Caucasus Region in the Context of Educational and Labour Migration” supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 24-18-00659).


For citation:

Kuziner E.N., Solovyova N.S. Forms of Youth Creativity in the North Caucasus: Cases of Nalchik and Pyatigorsk. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 2. P. 99-110



Abstract

The article examines the forms of creativity available to young people in two cities of the North Caucasus – Nalchik and Pyatigorsk – against the background of a persistent tension between territorial branding for tourism and the preservation of local authenticity. The theoretical framework draws upon debates on the “creative city” (S. Sassen, S. Zukin, R. Florida), the concept of bounded agency (K. Evans), and youth DIY practices (A. McRobbie). The empirical base consists of 83 in–depth interviews with students and young workers in creative industries, as well as a survey of 638 university students conducted in 2024. A comparative analysis highlights fundamental differences in the perception and practices of youth creativity: in Nalchik, creative activities develop predominantly in a DIY logic, relying on horizontal networks and compensating for the lack of institutional support, whereas in Pyatigorsk, creativity is embedded in institutional and entrepreneurial channels, with the university and municipal structures acting a s key mediators. Qualitative evidence further reveals that in the North Caucasus context, additional restrictions are imposed by ethno–cultural and religious norms, which enhance the role of young people as carriers of bounded agency and as mediators between global cultural trends and local identities. The study demonstrates that the differences between the two cities are defined not by the volume of creative potential, but by the mechanisms of its legitimation and support, which shape the sustainability of youth creative practices. More broadly, the cases of Nalchik and Pyatigorsk highlight the importance of examining creative industries in multi–ethnic regions of Russia, where youth play a crucial role in balancing authenticity and innovation, as well as in mediating between global and local cultural dynamics.


Keywords
youth; creative potential; creative industries; creative city; bounded agency; DIY; authenticity; territorial branding; ethnicity; North Caucasus

References

Авдеев Е. А., Воробьев С. М. Социокультурные основания идентичности студенческой молодежи Северного Кавказа: риски конфликтности межэтнических отношений // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2023. Т. 19. № 1. С. 4–21. DOI: 10.21638/spbu23.2023.101. EDN: WBLZTA. [Avdeev E. A., Vorobyov S. M. (2023) Sociocultural foundations of the identity of the student youth of the North Caucasus: the risks of conflict in interethnic relations. Politicheskaya e`kspertiza: POLITE`KS [Political expertise: POLITEX]. Vol. 19. No. 1: 4–21. (In Russ.)]

Ашутова Т. В., Желнина З. Ю. Стратегический проект «креативный город – территория развития» как модель взаимодействия опорного университета и региона // Высшее образование в России. 2019. Т. 28. № 3. С. 116–126. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3-116-126; EDN: ZAZDRB. [Ashutova T. V., Zhelnina Z. Yu. (2019) Strategic Project “Creative City – Territory of Development” as a Model of Interaction between Flagship University and the Region. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia]. Vol. 28. No. 3: 116–126. (In Russ.)]

Гущина Е. Г., Тарабанова Е. В. Креативные индустрии: новые возможности для развития российских городов и регионов // Вестник Вологодского госуниверситета. Экономика. 2022. Т. 24. № 1. С. 91–104. DOI: 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2022.1.9; EDN: LEFVJV. [Gushchina E. G., Tarabanova E. V. (2022) Creative industries: New opportunities for the development of Russian cities and regions. Vestnik Vologodskogo gosuniversiteta. Ekonomika [Bulletin of Vologda State University. Economy]. Vol. 24. No. 1: 91–104. (In Russ.)]

Зукин Ш. Культуры городов / пер. с англ. Д. Симановского. М.: НЛО, 2015. [Zukin S. (2015) The Cultures of Cities. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)]

Крупец Я. Н., Майборода А. В., Кузинер Е. Н. «Если ты маленький, ты никому не нужен»: молодые креативные предприниматели Санкт-Петербурга и их отношения с государством // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2021. Т. 19. № 3. С. 405–420. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-3- 405-420; EDN: EJQRWU. [Krupets Y., MaiborodaA., Kuziner E. (2021) ’If you are Small, Nobody Cares’: Young Creative Entrepreneurs of St. Petersburg and Their Relations with the State. Zhurnal issledovanij social`noj politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies]. Vol. 3. No. 19: 405–420. (In Russ.)]

Панина Е. А., Леонтьева А. В., Франченко Е. С. Креативные стратегии развития современных городов: особенности, сущность понятия и подходы к их пониманию // Регионология. 2023. Т. 31. № 4. С. 770–787. DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.125.031.202304.770-787; EDN: HJQKTC. [Panina E. A., Leontieva A. V., Franchenko E. S. (2023) Creative strategies for the development of modern cities: features, essence of the concept and approaches to understanding them. Regionologiya [Russian Journal of Regional Studies]. Vol. 31. No. 4: 770–787. (In Russ.)]

Chapain C., Comunian R. (2009) Enabling or inhibiting the creative economy: The role of the local and regional dimensions in England. Regional Studies. Vol. 44. No. 6: 717–734. DOI: 10.1080/00343400903107728.

D’Ovidio M., Cossu A. (2017) Culture is reclaiming the creative city: The case of Macao in Milan, Italy. City, Culture and Society. Vol. 8: 7–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2016.04.001.

Evans K. (2002) Taking control of their lives? Agency in young adult transitions in England and the New Germany. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 5. No. 3: 245–269.

Florida R. (2012) The rise of the creative class: revisited. New York: Basic Books.

Krupets Y., Epanova Y. (2023) Developing craft business in Russia: capitals and tactics of young cultural entrepreneurs. Cultural Trends. Vol. 32. No. 1: 20–34. DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2021.1996203.

Markusen A., Wassall G. H., DeNatale D., Cohen R. (2008) Defining the creative economy: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly. Vol. 22. No. 1: 24–45. DOI: 10.1177/0891242407311862.

McRobbie A. (2016) Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Pratt A. C. (2008) Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. Vol. 90. No. 2: 107–117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x.

Vanolo A. (2015) The image of the creative city, eight years later: Turin, urban branding and the economic crisis taboo. Cities. Vol. 46: 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.006.

Content No 2, 2026