Military Disobedience as a Social Phenomenon in a Special Military Operation Situation (a qualitative study)

Military Disobedience as a Social Phenomenon in a Special Military Operation Situation (a qualitative study)


Filimonov O.V.

Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Prof., Chief Researcher, All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russia, Moscow, Russia ofilimonov@yandex.ru

ID of the Article: 10894


For citation:

Filimonov O.V. Military Disobedience as a Social Phenomenon in a Special Military Operation Situation (a qualitative study). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 3. P. 130-142



Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of military disobedience (from latent forms of refusal to perform combat missions to unauthorized abandonment of duty stations) during the special military operation (SМO) in Ukraine in 2022–2025. Based on focused in-depth interviews with 25 servicemen of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Federal Service of the National Guard of Russia (Rosgvardiya), the key causes, dynamics and consequences of failures have been identified. A paired comparison of responses is used in two groups consisting of servicemen of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Russian Guard, with an emphasis on qualitative analysis. The main conclusions point to the predominance of pragmatic reasons (shock from mobilization, misinformation about service life, material motives, distrust of commanders, problems of rotation and provision), rather than ideological or moral and ethical (pacifism or religion are extremely rare, yielding to the cognitive dissonance between media and reality). The facts of failures are minimized by the authority of management, timely rotation and prevention. The limitations of the study are related to the high sensitivity of the data and formal prohibitions on disclosing information about those who refuse to perform tasks in the combat area. These findings indicate the urgent need to rethink approaches to personnel management in the combat zone. The research is aimed at filling a gap in the sociology of deviant behavior of military personnel in the context of modern armed conflict.


Keywords
military sociology; refusal to participate in hostilities; special military operation (SМO); managerial dysfunctions; deviant behavior

References

Avksentiev V. A., Ivanova S. Yu., Shulga M. M. (2024) Representations of the Ethnopolitical Situation in the North Caucasus in the Regional Media Space. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. No. 15(3): 37–54. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2024.15.3.4; EDN: BXLQLT. (In Russ.)

Baranovsky M. V. (2018) Trust in Military Collectives: A Sociological and Managerial Perspective. Moscow: Voenniy un-t. EDN: VXFNWU. (In Russ.)

Butko V. N. (2010) Oral History: Advantages and Disadvantages. Nauka i sovremennost’ [Science and Modernity]. No. 1–1: 118–123. EDN: RSLIRX. (In Russ.)

Chekinov S. G., Bogdanov S. A. (2013) On the Nature and Content of New-Generation Warfare. Voennaya mysl’ [Military Thought]. No. 10: 13–24. EDN: RGYZOX. (In Russ.)

Filimonov O. V. (2010) European Armies: A Soldier is a Citizen in Uniform (State of Army Social Infrastructure). Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe]. No. 3(43): 14–29. EDN: MUZLXD. (In Russ.)

Gorelov S. M. (2009) Legal Regulation of Responsibility for Evading Military Service through Feigning Illness or Other Means under Russian Criminal Codes. Yurist-Pravoved [Lawyer-Jurist]. No. 1(32): 41–46. EDN: KGDBUT. (In Russ.)

Goryushina E. M. (2019) A Soldier of an Inglorious War: Interview with a Participant in the 1994 Winter Storming of Grozny. Novoe proshloe [The New Past]. No. 1: 238–268. DOI 10.23683/2500-3224-2019-1-238-268; EDN: MRVOLD. (In Russ.)

Gray C. H. (1997) Postmodern War: The New Politics of Conflict. New York: Guilford Press.

Griffith J. (2011) Reserve Identities: What Are They? And Do They Matter? An Empirical Examination. Armed Forces & Society. No. 37(4): 619–635. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X10382213.

Gusak V. A. (2008) Desertion from the Red Army as a Social Basis of Crime during the Great Patriotic War (1941– 1945). Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law]. No. 8(108): 9–16. EDN: IWQTUT. (In Russ.)

Holsti K. (1996) The State, War and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Isakov V. M., Melnik E. V. (2025) Measures to Prevent Desertion during the Great Patriotic War. Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. No. 1: 68–74. DOI: 10.24412/2073-0454-2025-1-68-74; EDN: TAMGFS. (In Russ.)

Ivanova G. M. (2017) By the Laws of Wartime: State Law Enforcement during the Great Patriotic War. Trudy IRI RAN [Proceedings of the Institute of Russian History of RAS]. No. 14: 49–71. EDN: ZSVYSD. (In Russ.)

James W. (2015) The Moral Equivalent of War. Istoriya filosofii [History of Philosophy]. No. 20(1): 215–231. EDN: VUCBKZ. (In Russ.)

Kaldor M. (2015) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Moscow: In-t Gaidara. (In Russ.)

Karlova E. N. (2014) Historical Experience of American Military Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4(360): 89–96. EDN: SEIJOB. (In Russ.)

Korotnikova N. V. (2025) Public Opinion Surveys: Approaches to Sociological Study in Wartime Conflicts. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 158–166. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162525010189; EDN: QLADKW. (In Russ.)

Kumankov A. D. (2025) Heroes have no Place Here: The Culture of Modern Wars. INTER: Interaktsiya. Interv’yu. Interpretatsiya [INTER: Interaction. Interview. Interpretation]. No. 17(1): 11–21. DOI: 10.19181/inter.2025.17.1.1. EDN: YQCUWR. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva O. N., Podlesnaya M. A. (2024) Motivational Features of IT Specialists during Crises. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. No. 15(4): 213–234. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2024.15.4.11; EDN: SOSOTI. (In Russ.)

McMahan D. (2019) Rethinking the «Just War». Logos [The logo]. No. 29(3): 139–156. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2019-3-139-155; EDN: VCZHRV. (In Russ.)

Merridale K. (2005) Ivan’s War: The Red Army 1939–1945. London: Faber and Faber.

Molchanova T. V., Taranina E. I. (2023) Crime during the Special Military Operation. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal [Criminological Journal]. No. 3: 139–147. DOI 10.24412/2687-0185-2023-3-139-147; EDN: KGBAWP. (In Russ.)

Moskos C., Williams J., Segal D. (2000) The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War. Oxford University Press.

Obrazczov I. V. (2023) War in the Subject Field of Modern Foreign Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 167–172. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250025809-2; EDN: EBTBKC. (In Russ.)

Olikov S. (1926) Desertion in the Red Army and the Fight against it. Moscow: Voennaya tipografiya. (In Russ.)

Puzanova Zh.V., Filippov V. M. et al. (2023) Studying Factors in the Perception of Fake News by Mass Audiences: A Case Study of Students. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. No. 14(4): 128– 146. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2023.14.4.8; EDN: KOLZGV. (In Russ.).

Stvolygin K. V. (2020) Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Alternative Civilian Service in Russia. Minsk: BGU. (In Russ.)

Stvolygin K. V. (2023) The Issue of Alternative Civilian Service during the Special Military Operation. Aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoy nauki. Ufa: Vestnik nauki. EDN: SIZIJC. (In Russ.)

Sushchy S.Ya. (2019) Losses of the Russian Army during the Counter-Terrorist Operation in the North Caucasus (1999–2012): A Socio-Demographic Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 27–42. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004584-5; EDN: ZQRMNN. (In Russ.)

Sushchy S.Ya. (2021) Interviews as a Source of Information on the History of the Great Patriotic War and Other Military Campaigns: Opportunities and limitations. In: Personality. Society. State: problems of development and interaction. Krasnodar: Traditsiya. EDN: YNVSBA. (In Russ.)

Tatarova G. G., Chekhovsky I. V. (2012) The Focus Group Method: Expert Assessments of «Failure Factors». Sotsiologiya 4M: Metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie [Sociology 4M: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling]. No. 34: 5–31. EDN: PEOKEH. (In Russ.)

Walzer M. (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustration. New York: Basic Books.

Yanitsky O. N. (2014) Modern Wars: Socio-Ecological Dimensions. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. No. 4(11): 106–126. EDN: TDOCWJ. (In Russ.)

Content No 3, 2026