From Age Stratification to Inequalities System: an Intersectional Approach in the Sociology of Age

From Age Stratification to Inequalities System:
an Intersectional Approach in the Sociology of Age


Chernova Zh.V.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), leading research fellow, Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia chernova30@mail.ru

ID of the Article: 10928


For citation:

Chernova Zh.V. From Age Stratification to Inequalities System: an Intersectional Approach in the Sociology of Age. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 4. P. 112-120



Abstract

Sociological research has long treated age as a control variable rather than an independent axis of inequality. This article advances a conceptualization of age as an autonomous stratification principle, comparable to gender and class, that structures access to resources, shapes hierarchies of recognition, and establishes regimes of inclusion and exclusion. The theoretical framework integrates three complementary approaches: Anne Barrett’s tripartite model distinguishing age as institution, performance, and identity; de São José and Timonen’s multi-level conception addressing macro-, meso-, and micro-levels alongside age dispositions as internalized schemes linking structures to practices; and the “doing age” perspective developed by Cheryl Laz and Clary Krekula, which foregrounds the performative and embodied dimensions of age construction. Middle-aged women serve as a critical case for analysis, representing a point where cumulative life course effects reach maximum density while normative expectations remain ambivalent and contested. An intersectional analysis reveals how the “triple standard” of aging – operating at the intersection of age, gender, and class – combines with spatial differentiation of normative regimes to produce unequal access to resources for managing age and visibility. The article introduces into Russian sociological discourse a conceptual apparatus for analyzing age as a system of inequality, offering analytical tools applicable to both theoretical elaboration and empirical investigation.


Keywords
age, age inequality; doing age; age dispositions; intersectionality; life course; middle-aged women

References

Åberg E., Kukkonen I., Sarpila O. (2020) From Double to Triple Standards of Ageing. Perceptions of Physical Appearance at the Intersections of Age, Gender and Class. Journal of Aging Studies. Vol. 55: 100876. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100876.

Barrett A. E. (2022) Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 48: 213–232. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc‑083121-043741.

Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. (2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage Publications.

Bytheway B. (2011) Unmasking Age: The Significance of Age for Social Research. Bristol: Policy Press.

Brückner H., Mayer K. U. (2005) De-Standardization of the Life Course: What it Might Mean? And if it Means Anything, Whether it Actually Took Place? Advances in Life Course Research. Vol. 9: 27–53. DOI: 10.1016/S1040–2608(04)09002–1.

Calasanti T., King N. (2015) Intersectionality and Age. In: Twigg J., Martin W. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Cultural Gerontology. London; New York: Routledge: 193–200.

Crenshaw K. (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. Vol. 1989. No. 1: 139–167.

Crenshaw K. (1991) Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 43. No. 6: 1241–1299. DOI: 10.2307/1229039.

Gullette M. M. (1997) Declining to Decline: Cultural Combat and the Politics of the Midlife. Charlottesville & London: University Press of Virginia.

Davidenko M. (2019) The Ambiguities of Self-governance: Russian Middle-aged Middle-class Women’s Reflections on Ageing. Ageing & Society. Vol. 39. No. 3: 609–628. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X17001167.

Dannefer D. (2003) Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Vol. 58. No. 6: S327–S337. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327.

Diehl M., Wahl H.-W. et al. (2014) Awareness of Aging: Theoretical Considerations on an Emerging Concept. Developmental Review. Vol. 34. No. 2: 93–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2014.01.001.

Infurna F. J., Gerstorf D., Lachman M. E. (2020) Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and Challenges. American Psychologist. Vol. 75. No. 4: 470–485. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000591.

Johnson M. D., Galambos N. L., Krahn H. J. (2023) Perceived Stress Trajectories from Age 25 to 50 Years. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Vol. 47. No. 3: 265–276. DOI: 10.1177/01650254221150887.

Featherstone M., Hepworth M. (1991) The Mask of Ageing and the Postmodern Life Course. In: Featherstone M., Hepworth M., Turner B. S. (eds) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: Sage Publications: 371–389.

Ferraro K. F., Shippee T. P. (2009) Aging and Cumulative Inequality: How Does Inequality Get Under the Skin? The Gerontologist. Vol. 49. No. 3: 333–343. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnp034.

Freixas A., Luque B., Reina A. (2012) Critical Feminist Gerontology: In the Back Room of Research. Journal of Women & Aging. Vol. 24. No. 1: 44–58. DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2012.638891.

Holman D., Walker A. (2020) Understanding Unequal Ageing: Towards a Synthesis of Intersectionality and Life Course Analyses. European Journal of Ageing. Vol. 18. No. 2: 239–255. DOI: 10.1007/s10433–020–00582–7.

Höppner G., Urban M. (2018) Where and How Do Aging Processes Take Place in Everyday Life? Answers from a New Materialist Perspective. Frontiers in Sociology. Vol. 3. No. 7. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00007.

Kaufman S. R. (1986) The Ageless Self: Sources of Meaning in Late Life. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Kohli M. (2007) The Institutionalization of the Life-course: Looking Back to Look Ahead. Research in Human Development. Vol. 4. No. 3–4: 253–271. DOI: 10.1080/15427600701663122.

Krekula C. (2009) Age Coding: On Age-based Practices of Distinction. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life. Vol. 4. No. 2: 7–31. DOI: 10.3384/ijal.1652–8670.09427.

Lachman M. E., Teshale S., Agrigoroaei S. (2015) Midlife as a Pivotal Period in the Life Course: Balancing Growth and Decline at the Crossroads of Youth and Old Age. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Vol. 39. No. 1: 20–31. DOI: 10.1177/0165025414533223.

Laz C. (1998) Act Your Age. Sociological Forum. Vol. 13. No. 1: 85–113. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022160015408.

Laz C. (2003) Age Embodied. Journal of Aging Studies. Vol. 17. No. 4: 503–519. DOI: 10.1016/S0890–4065(03)00066–5.

Miller D. A. (1981) The “Sandwich” Generation: Adult Children of the Aging. Social Work. Vol. 26. No. 5: 419–423.

Moen P., Flood S. M., Wang J. (2022) The Uneven Later Work Course: Intersectional Gender, Age, Race, and Class Disparities. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. Vol. 77. No. 1: 170–180. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab039.

Neugarten B. L., Moore J. W., Lowe J. C. (1965) Age Norms, Age Constraints, and Adult Socialization. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 70. No. 6: 710–717. DOI: 10.1086/223965.

Pickard S. (2016) Age Studies: A Sociological Examination of How We Age and Are Aged through the Life Course. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781473957800.

Riley M. W., Johnson M., Foner A. (1972) Aging and Society. Vol. 3: A Sociology of Age Stratification. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Rowe J. W., Kahn R. L. (1997) Successful Aging. The Gerontologist. Vol. 37. No. 4: 433–440. DOI: 10.1093/geront/37.4.433.

de São José J. M.S., Timonen V. (2025) Age is not just a Number: Developing an Integrative Conceptual Framework on Age. Journal of Aging Studies. Vol. 73: 101331. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101331.

Sontag S. (1972) The Double Standard of Aging. Saturday Review. Vol. 55. No. 39: 29–38.

Shilling C. (1991) Educating the Body: Physical Capital and the Production of Social Inequalities. Sociology. Vol. 25. No. 4: 653–672. DOI: 10.1177/0038038591025004006.

Sumra M. K., Schillaci M. A. (2015) Stress and the Multiple-Role Woman: Taking a Closer Look at the “Superwoman”. PLoS ONE. Vol. 10. No. 3: e0120952. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120952.

Thomas A. J., Mitchell E. S., Woods N. F. (2018) The Challenges of Midlife Women: Themes from the Seattle Midlife Women’s Health Study. Women’s Midlife Health. Vol. 4: 8. DOI: 10.1186/s40695–018–0039–9.

Toothman E. L., Barrett A. E. (2011) Mapping Midlife: An Examination of Social Factors Shaping Conceptions of the Timing of Middle Age. Advances in Life Course Research. Vol. 16. No. 3: 99–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2011.08.003.

Thurston W. E., Meadows L. M. (2003) Rurality and Health: Perspectives of Mid-life Women. Rural and Remote Health. Vol. 3. No. 4: 219. DOI: 10.22605/RRH219.

West C., Zimmerman D. H. (1987) Doing Gender. Gender & Society. Vol. 1. No. 2: 125–151. DOI: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.

Wray Sharon (2007) Women Making Sense of Midlife: Ethnic and Cultural Diversity. Journal of Aging Studies. Vol. 21. No. 1: 31–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2006.04.001.

Wurm S., Diehl M. et al. (2017) How do Views on Aging Affect Health Outcomes in Adulthood and Late Life? Explanations for an Established Connection. Developmental Review. Vol. 46: 27–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2017.06.007.

Content No 4, 2026