Advanced Engineering Schools as a New Form of Personnel Training: the Results of the First Years of Work

Advanced Engineering Schools as a New Form of Personnel Training:
the Results of the First Years of Work


Kliucharev G.A.

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia; Prof. of the Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Law named after G.S. Aref’yeva, National Research University «Moscow Power Engineering Institut», Moscow, Russia Kliucharev@mail.ru

Tyurina I.O.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia

Chursina A.V.

Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia; Senior Lecturer, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia anna.chiursina@gmail.com

ID of the Article: 11073


For citation:

Kliucharev G.A., Tyurina I.O., Chursina A.V. Advanced Engineering Schools as a New Form of Personnel Training: the Results of the First Years of Work. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 8. P. 51-64



Abstract

“Advanced Engineering Schools” (2022–2030) is a federal project of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation aimed at training qualified engineering personnel for high-tech sectors of the economy. The project was part of the state program “Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation.” As of today, 50 leading universities in all regions of the country have received significant financial and organizational support for the development of advanced engineering schools, the training of highly qualified personnel, and active collaboration with leading industry enterprises and corporations. The present study aims to assess the first results achieved during the three-year project implementation period. To this end, in mid-2025, 340 AES –graduates, who were employed in their field of study at the Project’s partner enterprises, were surveyed. The data were compared with “regular” university graduates who do not participate in the Project (N = 500). It has been concluded that advanced engineering schools are an effective management step in the field of training and professional development for scienceintensive and highly specialized industries and businesses. However, the first three and a half years of the AES project have revealed a trend of one-time (individual) agreements in this area. These agreements are typically initiated by commercial organizations. The exception is in the mining industry, where cooperation with scientific and educational institutions is systematic. A positive development is the expansion of the range of motivational factors that encourage collaboration. For university administrations, this is additional state financial and administrative support, and for faculty members, it is an opportunity to acquire new knowledge and familiarize themselves with advanced technologies. However, a negative factor remains the departmental fragmentation of the project participants (Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of Industry and Trade).


Keywords
education; engineers; advanced engineering schools; science and engineering schools; STEM specialization; high-tech production; reform of professional engineering education; adult continuing education

References

Almukhambetova A., Kuzhabekova A. (2021) Negotiating Conflicting Discourses: Female Students’ Experiences in STEM Majors in an International University in Central Asia. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 43. No. 4: 570–593. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1875150.

Dart S., Young A., Steindl E.L. (2025) Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Influencing Development of Engineering Education Researchers. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 114. No. 4. DOI: 10.1002/jee.70030.

Denisova I.A., Kartseva M.A. (2008) Otdacha na urovni, tipy i kachestvo obrazovaniya [Return on Level, Types, and Quality of Education]. In: Zarabotnaya plata v Rossii: evolyuciya i differenciaciya [Wages in Russia: Evolution and Differentiation]. Ed. by V.E. Gimpelson, R.I. Kapelyushnikov. Moscow: VSHE: 343–409. (In Russ.)

Emelyanov A.N., Yakimovich E.P. (2023) Problems of introducing a network form of interaction in the educational process. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya [World of Science, Culture, and Education]. No. 5(102): 81–85. DOI: 10.24412/1991-5497-2023-5102-81-83; EDN: EQTYMJ. (In Russ.)

Gimpelson V.E., Zinchenko D.I., Chernina E.M. (2023) Wage premium in STEM careers. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 11: 28–50. DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-11-28-50; EDN: TFIBMP. (In Russ.)

Gimpelson V.E., Zinchenko D.I. (2021) “Physicists” and “Lyricists”: Who Is More Valuable to the Russian Market? Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 8: 5–36. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-5-36; EDN: ANSQPE. (In Russ.)

Ioffe B.L. (2018) Atom Projects: Events and People. Moscow: TSSPIM. (In Russ.)Kliucharev G.A., Popov M.S., Savinkov V.I. (2017) Education, Science, and Business: New Facets of Interaction. Moscow: IS RAN. (In Russ.)

Kolosova A.I., Rudakov V.N., Roshchin S.Y. (2020) The impact of job–education match on graduate salaries and job satisfaction. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 11: 113–132. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-11-113-132; EDN: QHJJEK. (In Russ.)

Menekse M., Stump G. et al. (2013) Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 102. No. 3: 346–374. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20021.

Nikitchuk I.I. (2023) Overcoming. Arzamas16: How It Was. Moscow: Alistorus. (In Russ.)

Nikolic S., Daniel S. et al. (2023) ChatGPT versus Engineering Education Assessment: A Multidisciplinary and MultiInstitutional Benchmarking and Analysis of This Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool to Investigate Assessment Integrity. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 48. No. 4: 559–614. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2213169.

Plant Engineer’s Handbook. (2001) Ed. by R.K. Mobley. Woburn, MA: ButterworthHeinemann: 1131–1150.

Popova I.P. (2023) Scientific schools in the views of scientists. Sotsiologichesskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 32–43. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029335-1; EDN: OTUIXE. (In Russ.)

Reeves S.M., Crippen K.J. (2021) Virtual Laboratories in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review, 2009–2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Vol. 30: 16–30. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-020-09866-0.

Schachter O. (1977) Invisible College of International Lawyers. Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 72: 217. Scientific School “MultiLevel Identity and Ideology of Innovative Development of Russian Society”: To the 110th Anniversary of Southern Federal University. (2025) RostovonDon; Taganrog: YuFU. (In Russ.)

Shevchenko V.I., Sheregi F.E., Strikhanov M.N. (2023) Reproduction of Engineering and Technical Specialists: Retrospective and Modernity. Moscow: MEPhI. EDN: RQTTRQ. (In Russ.)

de Solla Price D. J., Beaver D. (1966) Collaboration in an Invisible College. American Psychologist. Vol. 21. No. 11: 1011–1018. DOI: 10.1037/h0024051.

Wagner C.S. (2009) The New Invisible College: Science for Development. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Zuccala A. (2006) Modeling the Invisible College. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 57. No. 2: 152–168. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20256.

Content No 8, 2026