How are Engineers Trained? Expert Assessments of the Experience of Advanced Engineering Schools

How are Engineers Trained? Expert Assessments of the Experience of Advanced Engineering Schools


Dezhina I.G.

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia irina_dezhina@mail.ru

ID of the Article: 11074


For citation:

Dezhina I.G. How are Engineers Trained? Expert Assessments of the Experience of Advanced Engineering Schools. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 8. P. 65-77



Abstract

The Russian federal program for “Advanced Engineering Schools (AES)”, launched in 2022, aims to modernize engineering education in response to declining training quality and the country’s new priority of technological independence. Based on expert interviews with AES leaders (N = 7, 2025), the article examines how these schools redefine the profile of a “modern engineer,” what learning models they apply, and what obstacles they face beyond formal performance indicators. Experts unanimously stress that industry participation is essential: companies should co-design curricula, provide real engineering problems, and contribute practicing engineers as instructors. However, implementation varies widely because universities differ in resources, prior industry links, and capacity to attract external funding. Respectively, AES follow multiple training models, and this is beneficial since it ensures diversity. Some schools focus on producing “principal engineers” and future “chief designers”, others train engineers who can immediately add value in a specific partner company, while some emphasize entrepreneurial and economic competencies. A key constraint is the limited availability of company specialists for teaching, driven by workload and salary gaps. Upskilling university faculty through internships in partner firms is also difficult due to weak incentives and administrative barriers. The study revealed that after state funding ends, sustainability improves when schools diversify corporate partners rather than rely on a single “anchor” company. Moreover, the cessation of initial state funding triggered a positive shift from competition to collaboration among AES. These results confirm that AES serve as diverse experimental grounds for reshaping engineering training and university-industry relations.


Keywords
advanced engineering schools; engineering education; educational models; universityindustry cooperation; faculty training; skills; competencies

References

Aetdinova R.R. (2024) Advanced Engineering School as an effective technology for training future engineers. Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal «Koncept» [Scientific-methodological electronic journal “Koncept”]. No. 12: 87–104. DOI: 10.24412/2304-120X-2024-11203; EDN: GENHKS. (In Russ.)

Borovkov A.I., Burdakov S.F. et al. (2012) Sovremennoye inzhenernoye obrazovaniye [Modern engineering education]. St. Petersburg: Politekh. un-t. EDN: TYXUXF. (In Russ.)

Borovskaya M.A., Afanasyev A.A. et al. (2024) Transformation of Engineering Education for Strengthening Scientific and Technological Sovereignty of Russia. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. Vol. 28. No. 4: 11–29. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2024.04.032; EDN: XKXOSR. (In Russ.)

Conceptualization of Russian Engineering Education of the Future: Professional and Socio-Cultural Foundations. (2017) Ed. by I.B. Ardashkin. Tomsk: STT. (In Russ.)

Dart S., Cunningham S. et al. (2024) Factors Influencing Educators’ Implementation of Quality Teaching Practices in Australian Engineering Education. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 30. No. 1: 18–36. DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2024.2407284.

Dezhina I.G. (2025) University-Industry Research Collaboration: Faculty Perspectives. Sotsiologichesskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 139–149. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162525050124; EDN: FPMILC. (In Russ.)

Dezhina I.G., Ponomarev A.K. et al. (2025) Development of University-Industry Research Partnerships: Skoltech Practices. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis]. No. 29(3): 22–35. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2025.03.0018; EDN: ZTRPGU. (In Russ.)

Doing Science in Russia: The Business Climate in Science and Technology. Iss. 3. (2026) Ed. by L.M. Gokhberg, M.A. Gershman. Мoscow: ISIEZ VSHE. (In Russ.)

Emilio I.B.P., Zhdanovich O.A., Glushchenko V.V. (2026) Enhancing Research Efficiency in Advanced Engineering Schools through Customization and Community-Oriented Innovation. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education. Vol. 5. No. 1: 33–40.Glushchenko V.V. (2025) Advanced Engineering Schools as innovation hubs in post-industrial higher education: Institutional, pedagogical, and business model perspectives. ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology. Vol. 4. No. 2: 187–194.

Gudyaeva L.A., Prygunova M.I. (2023) Advanced engineering schools as a tool for achieving national technological sovereignty in the context of the regional socio-economic agenda. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo [Business. Education. Law]. No. 1: 13—19. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2023.62.504; EDN: XLMSBM. (In Russ.)

Keller A.V., Suvorov G.N. et al. (2025) Advanced Engineering Schools: Transfer of Competencies and Innovations in the Interests of Regional and Sectoral Development. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. Vol. 34. No. 2: 9–30. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-02-9-30; EDN: XKJHDO. (In Russ.)

Lattuca L.R., Bergom I., Knight D.B. (2014) Professional Development, Departmental Contexts, and Use of Instructional Strategies. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 103. No. 4: 549–572. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20055.

Pokholkov Yu.P., Agranovich B.L. (2012) Approaches to the formation of the national doctrine of engineering education in Russia in the context of new industrialization: Problems, goals, challenges. Inzhenernoye obrazovanie [Engineering Education]. No. 9: 5–11. EDN: SEOWBP. (In Russ.)

Poholkov Yu.P., Rozhkova S.V., Tolkacheva K.K. (2012) The Level of Training of Engineers in Russia: Assessment, Problems, and Solutions. Problemy upravleniya v social’nyh sistemah [Problems of Management in Social Systems]. Vol. 4. No. 7: 6–14. EDN: PCEGRP. (In Russ.)

Poholkov Yu.P. (2021) Engineering education in Russia: problems and solutions. Concept of development of engineering education in modern conditions. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie [Engineering Education]. No. 30: 96–107. EDN: VIRXFQ. (In Russ.)

Rudskoy A.I., Borovkov A.I., Romanov P.I. (2018) Russian Experience in Engineering Education Development. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 1(219): 151–162. EDN: YMVEVE. (In Russ.)

Shageeva F.T., Galihanov M.F., Strekalova G.R. (2018) Development of entrepreneurial competences of a future engineer as a factor in a successful professional career. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 2(220): 47–55. EDN: YPSRWN. (In Russ.)

Winkens A.K., Engelhardt F. et al. (2025) Enhanc(e)ing engineering education in Europe – crossnational perspectives on challenges and opportunities for university teaching practices. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 51. No. 3: 757–786 DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2025.2573884.

Content No 8, 2026