Decomposition of Liberal Values in Russia

Decomposition of Liberal Values in Russia


Kireev E.Yu.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Research Fellow, Scientific Center of Digital Sociology «Yadov-center», Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia yegorkireev@gmail.com

Kryshtanovskaya O.V.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Director, Scientific Center of Digital Sociology «Yadov-center», Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia olgakrysht@yandex.ru

ID of the Article: 11143


For citation:

Kireev E.Yu., Kryshtanovskaya O.V. Decomposition of Liberal Values in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 10. P. 17-30



Abstract

What has become of Russians’ liberal values 35 years after the collapse of the USSR? The article addresses this question drawing on the all-Russian survey “Sociocultural Identity of Russians” (2026, eight federal districts, N = 1113). The authors proceed from the premise that liberal ideas became mainstream in the 1990s and were later displaced from public politics without disappearing from mass consciousness. The analysis rests on three composite indices – liberal, statist and emancipative – built from respondents’ assessments of ten, nine and six value positions respectively. The data show that elements of the former liberal complex persist, but in a scattered form, having lost their ideological coherence. The defence of the private sphere and personal autonomy is reproduced as an everyday habit; basic freedoms survive at the level of declarations; the emancipative component, associated with tolerance and recognition of minorities, has retreated into a narrow, secular and predominantly young segment. Religiosity proves to be the strongest axis of value divergence, exceeding the generational divide, whereas education, contrary to Western patterns, has almost no discriminating power. The authors describe this state as a decomposition of the liberal complex accompanied by its demobilization: the carriers of a consistent liberal worldview – roughly one tenth of the population, delineated culturally rather than by class – have retreated from public politics into everyday practices.



References

Бурдье П. Практический смысл / Под ред. Н.А. Шматко. СПб.: Алетейя, 2001. EDN: QOGTMH. [Bourdieu P. (2001) The Logic of Practice. Ed. by N.A. Shmatko. St. Petersburg: Aleteija. (In Russ.)]

Горшков М.К., Аникин В.А. и др. Российское общество после президентских выборов – 2018: запрос на перемены. М.: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2018. EDN: RSUWUH. [Gorshkov M.K., Anikin V.A. et al. (2018) Russian Society after the Presidential Elections – 2018: The Demand for Change. Moscow: FNISC RAN. (In Russ.)]

Грамши А. Тюремные тетради. М.: Политиздат, 1991. [Gramsci A. (1991) The Prison Notebooks. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)]

Гудков Л.Д. Возвратный тоталитаризм: в 2 т. М.: НЛО, 2022. [Gudkov L.D. (2022) Returnable Totalitarianism: in 2 vols. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)]

Магун В.С., Руднев М.Г. Базовые ценности россиян и других европейцев (по материалам опросов 2008 года) // Вопросы экономики. 2010. № 12. С. 107–130. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2010-12-107-130; EDN: MWIYFX. [Magun V.S., Rudnev M.G. (2010) Basic Values of Russians and Other Europeans. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 12: 107–130. (In Russ.)]

Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: ФЭК «Начала», 1997. EDN: YQDVYE. [North D. (1997) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Moscow: FEK «Nachala». (In Russ.)]

Петухов Р.В. Запрос на перемены: политико-ценностное измерение // ПОЛИС. Политические исследования. 2020. № 6. С. 103–118. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.06.08; EDN: MGUUHH. [Petukhov R.V. (2020) The Demand for Change: The Political and Value Dimension. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 6: 103–118. (In Russ.)]

Beetham D. (1991) The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Cohen S.F. (2000) Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post-Communist Russia. New York: W.W. Norton.

Deneen P.J. (2018) Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Eisenstadt S.N. (2000) Multiple Modernities. Daedalus. Vol. 129. No. 1: 1–29.

Fukuyama F. (2022) Liberalism and Its Discontents. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Hoffman D.E. (2002) The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia. New York: PublicAffairs.

Hough J.F. (2001) The Logic of Economic Reform in Russia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krastev I. (2017) After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Kryshtanovskaya O., White S. (2009) The Sovietization of Russian Politics. Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 25. No. 4: 283–309. DOI: 10.2747/1060-586X.24.4.283; EDN: MXCGHT.

Laclau E., Mouffe C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

Schwartz S.H. (2012) An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Vol. 2. No. 1: 1–20. DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1116.

Welzel C. (2013) Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Content No 10, 2026