The idea of neurosociology in contemрorary social thought

The idea of neurosociology in contemрorary social thought

Bazhanov V.A.

Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Ulyanovsk State University, Head of Department of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science Chairperson, Leading Researcher, Tomsk State University, Ulyanovsk, Russia

ID of the Article: 6643

For citation:

Bazhanov V.A. The idea of neurosociology in contemрorary social thought. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2017. No 4. P. 27-33


The paper has the goal to argument that the intensive development during last decades of cognitive researches and neuroscience (especially historico-cultural neuroscience) resulted in the formation of neurosociology. Neurosociology as a branch of social science in fact follows the Kantian research program in its progressive mode. This means that the analysis of the mechanisms of development and features of different societies and socio-cultural structures under certain conditions should necessary consider the profound and direct impact (and/or correlation with) of certain neural structures traits, which in their turn are transformed according to the socio-cultural features of various societies and certain culturally autonomous social groups. Thus, due to the spirit (but not the letter) of the Kantian a priori idea social cognition to a certain extent depends of preset features (ontogenetic and/or formed by the current activity) retrofit neurobiological structures. This tendency reflects once again emerging naturalistic approach in contemporary social thought. We introduce the notion of social psychologism, which summarizes the cognitive aspects defined by epigenetic features of certain social communities.

neuroscience; neurosociology; research program; individualist and collectivist society; tightness and loosely organized societies


Свааб Д. Мы – это наш мозг: от матки до Альцгеймера. СПб.: Изд-во Ивана Лимбаха, 2014. [Swaab D. (2014) My – eto nash mozg: Ot matki do Al’tsgeymera [We is Our Brain: From Uterus to Alzheimer Disease]. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo Ivana Limbaha. (In Russ.)]

Фаликман М. В., Коул М. “Культурная революция” в когнитивной науке: от нейронной пластично- сти до генетических механизмов приобретения культурного опыта // Культурно-историческая психология. 2014. Т. 10. № 3. С. 4–18. [Falikman M. V., Cole M. (2014) “Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya” v kognitivnoy nauke: ot neyronnoy plastichnosti do geneticheskikh mekhanizmov priobreteniya kul’turnogo opyta [“Cultural Revolution” in Cognitive Science: From Neuron Pliability to Genetic Mechanisms of Gaining Cultural Experience]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija [Cultural and historical psychology]. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 3: 4–18. (In Russ.)]

Шкурко А. В. На пути к нейросоциологии // Социологические исследования. 2011. № 4. С. 13–22. [Shkurko A. V. (2011) On the way to neurosociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 4: 13–22. (In Russ.)]

Cacioppo J. T., Decety J. Challenges and Opportunities in Social Neuroscience // Annual Ney York Academy of Science. 2011. Vol. 124(1). P. 162–173.

Campbell A. Oxytocin and Human Social Behavior // Personality and Psychology Review. 2010. Vol. 14. P. 281–295.

Chiao J. Y., Bebko G. M. Cultural Neuroscience of Social Cognition // Culture and Neural Frames of Cognition and Communication /Ed. by S. Han, E. Poppel. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. P. 19–39.

Chiao J. Y., Cheon B. K., Pornpattanangkul N., Mrazek A. J., Blizinsky K. D. Cultural Neuroscience: Progress and Promise // Psychological Inquiry. 2013. Vol. 24(1). P. 1–19.

Chiao J. Y., Blizinsky K. D. Culture-Gene Coevolution of Individualism-Collectivism and the Serotonin Transporter Gene // Proceeding of Royal Society. B. 2009. Vol. 1650. P. 1–10.

Chiao J., Hariri A., Harada T., Mano Y., Sadato N., Parish T., Iidaka T. Theory and methods in cultural neuroscience // SCAN. 2010. Vol. 5. P. 356–361.

Chiao J. Y., Immordino-Yang M.H. Modularity and the Cultural Mind: Contributions of Cultural Neuroscience to Cognitive Theory // Perspectives of Psychological Science. 2013. Vol. 8(1). P. 56–61.

Dehaene S., Brannon E. Space, Time, and Number: a Kantian Research Program // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010. Vol. 14. № 2. P. 517–519.

Dunbar R. I.M. Darwin and the Ghost of Primes Gage: Neuro-Evolution and the Social Brain // CORTEX. 2009a. Vol. 45. P. 1119–1125.

Dunbar R. I.M. The Social Brain Hypothesis and its Importance for Social Evolution // Annual Human Biology. 2009b. Vol. 36(5). P. 562–572.

Emery N. J., Easton A. Introduction: What is Social Cognitive Neuroscience (SCN)? // The Cognitive Neuroscience of Social Behavior. Hove and New York: Psychology press, 2016. P. 1–16.

Ford B. Q., Dmitrieva J. O., HellerD., Chentsova-Dutton Y., Grossmann I., Tamir M., Uchida Y., Koopmann- Holm B., Floerke V. A., Uhrig M., Bokhan T., Mauss I. B. Culture Shapes Whether the Pursuit of Happiness Predicts Higher or Lower Well-Being // Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 2015. Online publication. URL: (accessed 18.09.2018).

Franks D. D. Neurosociology. The Nexus Between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, 2010.

Franks D. D. Emergence and Reductionism in Sociology and Neuroscience // Handbook of Neurosociology / Franks D. D., Turner J. H. (eds). New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, 2013. P. 107–118.

Franks D. D., Turner J. H. (eds). Handbook of Neurosociology. N.Y., Dordrecht, Heidelberg, L., 2013.

Gallistel C. R., Gelman R. Preverbal and Verbal Counting and Computation // Cognition. 1992. Vol. 44. P. 43–74.

Han S., Ma Y. Cultural differences in human brain activity: a quantitative meta-analysis // NeuroImage. 2014. Vol. 99. P. 293–300.

Hatemi P. K., Smith K., Alford J. R., Martin N. G., Hibbing J. R. The Gene and Environment Foundations of Political Psychology // Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2015. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 243–255.

Jost J. T., Amodio D. M. Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence // Motivation and Emotion. 2012. Vol. 36. P. 55–64.

Kanai R., Feilden T., Firth C., Rees G. Political Orientations are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults // Current Biology. 2011. Vol. 21(8). P. 677–680.

Kim H. S., Sasaki J. Y. Cultural Neuroscience: Biology of the Mind in Cultural Contexts // Annual Review of Psychology. 2014. Vol. 65. P. 487–514.

Kiser D., Steemers B., Branchi I., Homberg J. R. The Reciprocal Interaction between Serotonin and Social Behavior // Neuroscience Biobehavior Review. 1012. Vol. 36(2). P. 786–798.

Lakoff G. Neural Social Science // Handbook of Neurosociology / Franks D. D., Turner J. H. (Eds). New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, 2013. P. 9–26.

Nail P. R., McGregor I. Threat Causes Liberals to Think Like Conservatives // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009. Vol. 45. P. 901–907.

Norman G. J., Hawkley L. C., Luhmann M., Cacioppo J. T., Berntson G. G. Social Neuroscience and the Modern Synthesis of Social and Biological Levels of Analysis // Handbook of Neurosociology / Franks D. D., Turner J. H. (eds). New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, 2013. P. 67–82.

Sfera A., Osorio C. Thinking Pattern East and West // SOJ Psychology. 2014. Vol. 1 (4). P. 1–2.

Soroka S., MacAdams S. News, Politics, and Negativity // Political Communication. 2015. Vol. 32. P. 1–22.

Raine A. From Genes to Brain to Antisocial Behavior // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2008. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 5323–5328.

World Happiness Report / Helliwell J., Layard R., Sachs J. (eds). UN, 2016.

Content No 4, 2017