Metaphor as a cognitive obstacle (extmplyfied by the concept ”Institute”)
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Senior researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
Despite solid scientific biography, the subject of metaphor retains its position in the topical repertoire of sociology. Research interest in this theme reflects epistemological specificity of social knowledge, which to a large degree relies on metaphors. The wont to operate with images incorporated into the very style of sociological theorizing and researchers simply does not detect it. But metaphor might both stimulate and block social analysis. The article deals with the problem exemplyfied by core terms in sociology ‘the social institute’. It is one of the most important and at the same time obscure sociological concepts. Two cases of its usage have been examined in the article, the first is research programme ‘Institutional logics’ (IL), the second institutional treatment of corruption. It is shown that in both cases the ‘institute’ turned out to be a metaphor rather than a scientific term. This metaphor contains three metaphorical layers, which have been formed by the etymology of the word ‘Institute’, its juridical history and sociological usage. IL describes the principles and rules which organizational actors are guided by in their activities, and it is not obvious that the matter is about institutional phenomena. As for ‘institute of corruption’, the corruption (a form of it called system or grand corruption) is really similar to institute. However, there is a number of criteria which the phenomenon of corruption does not correspond to. IL deals with the metaphor which in the theory of metaphor is called predicative. ‘The institute of corruption’ can be understood rather as identifying metaphor. Whereas in case of Institutional logics the concept ‘institute’ reveals some heuristic potential, in case of corruption it rather blocks understanding of this phenomenon than helps to comprehend it.
Baranov A.N. (2004a) Editor’s preface. In: Lakoff G., Johnsen M. Metaphors we Live by. M.: Editorial URSS: 7–21. (In Russ.)
Baranov A.N. (2004b) Metaphorical facets of the phenomenon of corruption. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity]. No. 2: 70–79. (In Russ.)
Bе’vort F., Suddaby R. (2016) Scripting professional identities: How individuals make sense of contradictory institutional logics. Journal of Professions and Organization. No. 3 (1): 17–38.
Bychenkov V.M. (1996) Institutes: Over Collective Entities and Impersonal Forms of Social Subjectiveness. Moscow: The Russian Academy of social sciences. (In Russ.)
Dejneko A. (2010) A metaphor in modern sociology: from “poetic” wealth to “phonologic” (without) responsibility. In: The 5th Kowalewski readings. Materials of a scientific and practical conference. Saint-Petersburg: Skifija-print. (In Russ.)
Dvoreckij I.H. (1976) Latin-Russian Dictionary. Moscow: “Russkij jazyk”. (In Russ.)
Friedland R., Mohr J.W., Roose H. and Gardinali P. (2014) The institutional logics of love: measuring intimate life. Theory and Society. Vol. 43. No. 3–4: 333–370.
Friedland R., Alford R.R. (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell W.W. and DiMaggio P.J. (eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: 232–263.
Golovaha E. (2012) Sociology between art fiction and scientific knowledge. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii [The journal of sociology and social anthropology]. Vol. XV. No. 3 (62): 25–34. (In Russ.)
Gusev S.S. (1988) Orderliness of the scientific theory and language metaphors. In: Metaphor in the language and the text. Moscow: Nauka. P. 119–133. (In Russ.)
Hodgson G.M. (2006) What Are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues. XL: 1–25.
Klitgaard R. (1988) Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lakoff G. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony A. (ed.). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge.
McGovern F.E. (1907) Legal Repression of Political Corruption. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association. No. 4: 266–76.
McPherson C.M., Sauder M. (2013) Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly. No. 58 (2): 165–196.
Oparina E.O. (1988) Conceptual metaphor. In: Metaphor in the Language and The Text. Moscow: Nauka: 65–77. (In Russ.)
Porta D.d., Vannucci A. (2012) The Hidden Order of Corruption: An Institutional Approach. Farnham: Ashgate.
Rassokhina M.V. (2001) Methaphor in the Language of Sociological Theory. Moscow. (in Russ.)
Rose-Ackerman S. (1975) The Economics of Corruption. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 4. Issue 2: 187–203.
Rose-Ackerman S. (1978) Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. New York: Academic Press.
Rothstein B. (2007) Anti-Corruption – A Big Bang Theory (work in progress). QoG Working Paper Series. 3. Quality Gov. Inst., Univ. Gothenburg. URL: http://www.sahlgrenska.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350652_2007_3_rothstein.pdf (accessed 03.05.2014).
Satarov G.A. (2004) Corruption relationship: Agency model and related approaches. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity]. No. 2: 60–69. (In Russ.)
Shmerlina I.A. (2016) Corruption as a diffuse institute. Modern Research of Social Problems. No. 11 (67): 248–277. URL: http:// journal-s.org/index.php/sisp/article/view/9650/pdf (accessed 06.02.2017).
Spencer H. (1898) The Principles of Sociology in three vol. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Tatarova G.G. (2008) Analytical philosophy: metaphor or concept?. In: Theses of the III All-Russian sociological congress (Moscow, on October 21–24, 2008). Moscow: IS RAN; ROS. (In Russ.)
Telija V.N. (1988) Metaphorization and its role in creation of a language picture of the world. In: The Role of a Human Factor in Language: Language and the Picture of the World. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Texts on the history of sociology of XIX–XX centuries. Reader (1994). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Thornton P., Lounsbury M., Ocasio W. (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Thornton P., Ocasio W. (2008) Institutional Logics. In: Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R. (eds). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE: 99–129.
Thornton P.H., Ocasio W. (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 105. No. 3: 801–843.
Timofeev L.G. (2000) Institutional Corruption: Theoretical Essay. Moscow: RGGU. (In Russ.)