Socio-legal and Socio-economic Aspects of Privacy
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Lecturer, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Regional Development of Povolzhsky Institute of Management named after P.A. Stolypin, Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Saratov, Russia. email@example.com
The article considers the history of formation of the concept of privacy, as well as peculiarities of understanding of this phenomenon in modern society in legal, economic and social context. The main historical stages of transformation of the concept of privacy are highlighted. The judicial processes connected with protection of private life, which were held in XX–XXI centuries in the USA, are considered. The example of the American legal model established that the initial inclusion of privacy in the legal field was a means of protecting the individual against possible invasion of privacy. In the context of the analysis of modern understanding of privacy, it is proved that the improvement of digital technologies and digitization of personal data together with the possibility of their automatic collection and processing leads to notions of privacy as an analogue to intellectual property of the individual. Personal data is increasingly becoming a commodity for client-oriented companies. At the same time, Western society still tends to understand the elites‘ privacy as human rights and dignity. The analysis of the development prospects of the digital society gives reason to believe that in the near future it is possible to expect appreciable influence of transformation of artificial intellect systems on understanding of privacy.
Allen A.L. (1988) Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Altemimei D. (2013) Prostitution and the Right to Privacy: a Comparative Analysis of Current Law in the United States and Canada. Illinois Law Preview. No. 2: 625–660.
Arendt H. (2017) Vita Activa or about Active Life. Moscow: Аd Marginem. (In Russ.)
Bauman Z. (2006) Freedom. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo. (In Russ.)
Bogdanova E. (2017) Rethinking Public and Private in an Acoustic Community: Investigation of Contemporary Russian Village. Laboratorium. No. 9(1): 4–29. (In Russ.)
Bratt C.S. (1984) Incest Statutes and the Fundamental Right of Marriage: Is Oedipus Free to Marry? Family Law Quarterly. Vol. 18. No. 3: 257–309.
BurnhamW. (2006) Legal System of the United States. 3rd ed. Moscow: Novaya justitia. (In Russ.)
Chesnokova L. (2017) The Right to Privacy as a Necessary Aspect of Human Dignity. Istoricheskie, philosophskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Juridical Sciences, Culturology and Art Studies. Theory and Practice Issues]. No. 6. Vol. 2: 196–199. (In Russ.)
Emelin V.A. (2014). Loss of Privacy: Identity in the Context of Technological Control. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. No. 2: 19–26. (In Russ.)
Evstifeeva Е. et al. (2006) Privacy in the Era of Engagement. Vlast [Power]. Vol. 24. No. 1: 36–40. (In Russ.)
Gutwirth S. (2002) Privacy and the Information Age. Lanham; Boulder; New York; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Habermas J. (2005) Political Works. Moscow: Praxis. (In Russ.)
Kubis J.F. (1980) Some Problems of Privacy and Surveillance in a Technological Age. In: Bier W.C. (ed.) Privacy: a Vanishing Value? New York: Fordham University Press: 193–229.
Levine M.H. (1980) Privacy in the Tradition of the Western World. In: Bier W.C. (ed.) Privacy: a Vanishing Value? New York: Fordham University Press: 3–21.
Lupton D. (2014) Digital Sociology. London; New York: Routledge.
Melnikov M.V. (2016) Private and Public in the Historical Process. Theoretical and Sociological Analysis. Novosibirsk: Izdatelstvo NGTU. (In Russ.)
Nijsten M. (1990) Abortion and Constitutional Law. A Comparative European-American Study. Florence: European University Institute.
Nissenbaum H. (2009) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Pronkina E.S. (2016) Public and Private Modes in Social Media. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. No. 4: 315–319. (In Russ.)
Richards D.A.J. (1981) Constitutional Privacy, the Right to Die and the Meaning of Life: a Moral Analysis. William and Mary Law Review. Vol. 22. No. 3: 327–419.
Shabashev V.A., Shcherbakova L.N. (2016) Trends of the Digital Divide/Equality in Contemporary World. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 3–12. (In Russ.)
Westin A.F. (1967) Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.