Social Responsibility of Soviet Political Elites in Historical Retrospect

Social Responsibility of Soviet Political Elites in Historical Retrospect

Simonyan R.Kh.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher of the Institute of International Studies, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia

ID of the Article: 8111

This article was prepared with the financial support of MGIMO University in the framework of project No. 1921-01-01 “The Sociocultural Phenomenon of the Border Region in the post-Soviet Space: Mass Consciousness, Ethnocultural and Religious Identities, Social Practices”.

Rubric: Anniversary

For citation:

Simonyan R.Kh. Social Responsibility of Soviet Political Elites in Historical Retrospect. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2020. No 4. P. 135-143


Historical experience has shown that sustainable development of the human community in the process of making managerial decisions needs taking into account not only interests of individuals or organizations making these decisions, but also interests, values and goals of wide social groups and society as a whole. This ethical principle is the content of the concept of “social responsibility” – one of the fundamental concepts in social science. The relevance of this principle grows in connection with an increasing role of subjective factor in the socio-historical process. Social responsibility becomes especially important for activities of the most influential social groups. Thus, the increasing impact on society and the environment of the activities of managers and organizers of industrial production has drawn attention to the social responsibility of this social group. Responsibility for the state of society and the natural environment is becoming an important area of social science, the number of studies in this area of scientific knowledge multiplies. Higher education institutions are expanding their teaching courses like “Social Responsibility of Business”. At the same time, there is another social group – political elite of society, to whose activity this ethical principle is even more relevant due to its greater influence. The article – starting from the early to the late Soviet period – analyzes nature and forms of social responsibility manifestations of first persons of the state.

historical sociology; sociology of law; theocratic model of social responsibility; monological governing model


Background Information from the Editorial Board of the Journal. (1963) Mezdunarodnaya zhizn' [International Life]. No. 11: 146–148. (In Russ.)

Bakatin V.V. (1999) The Road in the Past Tense. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf. (In Russ.)

Brutents K.N. (2005) Unfulfilled. Partial Notes about Perestroika. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russ.)

Eremeev D.E. (2005) Turkey during the Second World War and the “Cold” War (1939–1990). Moscow: Gumanitariy. (In Russ.)

Fedorov V.P. (2004) Tragedy of Russia: Extinction of the People and Territorial Insecurity. Moscow: IE RAN. (In Russ.)

Hough J.F. (1997) Democratization and Revolution in the USSR, 1985–1991. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

How Khrushchev was Fired: Materials of the Plenum of the CPSU Central Committee (October 1964). (1993) Istoricheskiy arkhiv [Historical Archive]. No. 1: 14–38. (In Russ.)

Jonas G. (2004) Principle of Responsibility. The Experience of Ethics for Technological Civilization. Moscow: Ayris-press. (In Russ.)

Kudryavtsev V.N. (1986) Law, Act, Responsibility. Moscow. Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russ.)

Nezhinsky L. (ed.) (1999) Russia and the Black Sea Straits (XVIII–XX Сenturies). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russ.)

Onikov L.A. (1996) KPSS: Anatomy of the Collapse. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)

Pivovarov Yu.S. (2006) Russian Politics in its Historical and Cultural Relations. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Retief de La Breton N. (1924) Nights of the Revolution. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. (In Russ.)

Ryzhkov N.I. (1992) Perestroika: History of Betrayal. Moscow: Novosti. (In Russ.)

Shaburov A.S. (1992) Political and Legal Aspects of Social Responsibility of the Individual. Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation. Yekaterinburg. (In Russ.)

Simonyan R.H. (2019) The Baltic States and Russia in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations]. Vol. 63. No. 9: 61–68. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-61-68. (In Russ.)

Simonyan R.H. (2002) The Baltic States and the Collapse of the USSR (On Some Myths and Stereotypes of Mass Consciousness). Voprosy istorii [Questions of History]. No. 12: 27–39. (In Russ.)

Skocpol T. (2017) States and Social Revolutions: a Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Moscow: In-t Gaidara. (In Russ.)

Smirnov I.V. (2013) Sociological Approach to Understanding Legal Responsibility. Uchyonye trudy rossijskoy akademii advokatury i notariata [Transactions of the Advocacy and Notarial Academy of Russia]. No. 2(29): 74–79. (In Russ.)

Stein K. (2009) The Responsibility of Political Actors. Tubingen: Mohr Siebek. (In Germ.)

The Annual Report of the NKID to the VIII Congress of Soviets (1919–1920). (1921) Moscow: Narkominodel. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (2003) Ethnocracy: History and Modernity (Sociological Essays). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Yakovlev A.N. (1994) Bitter Cup. Bolshevism and the Reformation of Russia. Yaroslavl: Verkhne-Volzhskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russ.)

Content No 4, 2020