Consumer Society: Case of Modeling Relationships Between Consumerism and Religiousness

Consumer Society:
Case of Modeling Relationships Between Consumerism and Religiousness


Babich N.S.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Sociology of the RUDN University of Russia; Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. sociolog@mail.ru

Batykov I.V.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Head of the laboratory, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia. ivbatykov@socexpertiza.ru

ID of the Article: 9209


For citation:

Babich N.S., Batykov I.V. Consumer Society: Case of Modeling Relationships Between Consumerism and Religiousness. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2022. No 7. P. 97-108




Abstract

This article is an attempt to establish the empirical validity of hypotheses describing the relationship between the evolution of consumer society and religion. Four hypotheses are considered: “secularization” (religion declines with the growing consumerization of societies), “radicalization” (the importance of religion rises in the face of the hostile values of rampant consumption), “commodification” (religion is assimilated by the consumer society as an area of spiritual services) and “the third variable” (religion is associated not with the development of consumption, but with economic development as such). Based on the available statistics for various countries of the world, ways to measure the levels of consumerization and the importance of religion in modern societies are sequentially considered, as well as statistical predictions of each of the four hypotheses. By analyzing the correlations between the consumerization index and the level of GDP, on the one hand, and individual religiosity and state support for religion, on the other hand, we checked whether the real data corresponded to those predictions. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the expansion of the space of consumption opportunities is associated with a decrease in the level of individual religiosity in the crosscountry context. That is, the first hypothesis is confirmed – about the connection between secularization and consumerization.


Keywords
consumer society; consumerization; public wealth; religion; religiosity; secularization; radicalization; religion and state; cross-country comparisons

References

Бабич Н.С., Батыков И.В. Индекс развития общества потребления: теоретическое обоснование и первичная валидизация показателя // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2022. № 1. С. 84–96. [Babich N.S., Batykov I.V. (2022) Index of the consumer society development: Theoretical basis and primary validation. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sociologiya [RUDN Journal of sociology]. No. 1: 84–96. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-1-84-96.

Бабич Н.С., Хоменко В.И. Логические и практические трудности многомерного подхода к измерению религиозности // Социологический журнал. 2013. № 2. С. 89–96. [BabichN.S., KhomenkoV.I. (2013) Logical and practical difficulties of multidimensional measurement of religiosity. Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal]. No. 2: 89–96. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2013.2.384.

Бергер П.Л. Священная завеса: элементы социологической теории религии. М.: НЛО, 2019. [Berger P.L. (2019) Sacred Canopy: Elements of the Sociological Theory of Religion. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)]

Пруцкова Е. Операционализация понятия «религиозность» в эмпирических исследованиях // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2012. № 2. С. 268–293. [Prutskova E. (2012) The concept of religiosity: operationalization in empirical research. Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 2: 268–293. (In Russ.)]

Тернер Б. Религия в постсекулярном обществе // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2012. № 2. С. 24–25. [Turner B. (2012) Religion in a post-secular society. Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 2: 24–25. (In Russ.)]

Bauman Z., Donskis L. (2016) Liquid evil: living with TINA. Cambridge: Polity.

Bauman Z., Obirek S. (2015) Of God and Man. Cambridge: Polity.

Castells M., Hlebik S.Alternative Economic Practices in Barcelona: Surviving the Crisis, Reinventing Life. In: Another Economy is Possible. Ed. by M.Castells. Cambridge: Polity: 160–186.

Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fox J. (2019) A world survey of secular-religious competition: state religious policy from 1990 to 2014. Religion, State & Society. Vol. 47(1): 10–29. DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2018.1532750.

Gauthier F. (2019) Religion, modernity, globalisation: Nation-state to market. London: Routledge.

Hirschle J. (2014) Consumption as a source of social change. Social Forces. Vol. 92. No. 4: 1405–1433. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sou001.

Inglehart R.F. (2021) Religion’s sudden decline: what’s causing it, and what comes next? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Inglehart R., Norris P. (2011) Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Possamai A. (2014) Sociology of religion for generations X and Y. London: Routledge.

Strulik H. (2016) Secularization and Long-Run Economic Growth. Economic Inquiry. Vol. 54. No. 1: 177–200. DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12242.

Wieviorka M. (2012) Evil. Cambridge: Polity.

Wieviorka M. (2018) Europe facing evil: Xenophobia, racism, anti-semitism and terrorism. In: Europe’s crises. Ed. by M.Castells. Cambridge: Polity: 205–223.

 

Content No 7, 2022