Attitudes Toward Coronavirus Protection Measures in Enterprises (on the Example of the Ulyanovsk Region)

Attitudes Toward Coronavirus Protection Measures in Enterprises (on the Example of the Ulyanovsk Region)

Andreeva Ju.V.

Сand. Sci. (Ps.), Assoc. Prof., Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, Russia.

Lukyanova E.L.

Lecturer of Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, Russia.

ID of the Article: 9244

This work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 20-04-60221 «Strategies for Workers’ Behavior in the Labor Market in Difficult Epidemiological Situation».

For citation:

Andreeva Ju.V., Lukyanova E.L. Attitudes Toward Coronavirus Protection Measures in Enterprises (on the Example of the Ulyanovsk Region). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2022. No 8. P. 67-77


The paper explores anti-COVID restrictions in Russian enterprises. It based on a series of qualitative interviews conducted with workers and experts as part of a longitudinal study in 2020–2021 in the Ulyanovsk region. We focus on three key aspects: quarantine, mask wearing and vaccination, showing the attitudes of workers towards these measures, the degree of their acceptance or resistance to them. We conclude that restrictions were largely ineffective, but they allowed employers to increase control over staff and led to violations of labor rights. Coercion rather than persuasion served as the primary tool for promoting anti-COVID measures. The workers did not relate the implementation of these measures to occupational safety or management’s concern about their health, but expressed a growing feeling of powerlessness. Anti-COVID restrictions are perceived to have reduced staff cohesion and caused conflicts between workers and management. Informants criticized both the content of the measures and the non-systemic manner of their implementation. The paper traces how long the anti-COVID measures lasted, and what were the reasons for their cancellation.

COVID-19; industrial enterprises; workers; anti COVID-19 measures


Kapeliushnikov R.I. (2021) Anatomy of the Coronocrisis through the Lens of the Labor Market Adjustment: Working paper WP3/2021/09. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)

Oslon А.А. (eds) (2022) Lifestyle: how the Coronavirus Changed Everyday Life / A.I. Bobrova, K.P. Glazkov, E.S. Zakutina, G.L. Kertman, I.G. Osipova, A.S. Reynyuk. Moscow: Institut FOM (inFOM). (In Russ.)

Podvoyskiy D.G., Spirkina A.K. (2021) “Masked” and “Gloved” Society Under the Microscope of the Sociology of Everyday Life: A Quick Look. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsialʹnyye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 2: 315–339. (In Russ.)

Romanovich N.A. (2020) Two Halves of One Nation: How a Small Business Did Not Comply with Restric‑ tive Measures. In: Small Business Crash Test in Lessons and Consequences of the Pandemic First Wave (24 Research Companies Joint Interregional Group Reports Collection Based on the Results of an Initiative Study of the Small Business State during the Period of Self-isolation). Moscow: 113–126. (In Russ.)

The Situation of Vulnerable Groups during the Spread of COVID‑19: Needs and Support Measures. (2020) Moscow: TsPUR; All-Russian Civil Forum. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (ed.) (2021) Intelligentsia in New Reality: a сollection of articles of XXII International The‑ oretical and Methodological Conference, RSUH, September, 30 – October, 12021. Preprint. Moscow. TsSP i M. (In Russ.)

Content No 8, 2022