Crisis of Trust: Field Notes from a Research on Aging in Villages

Crisis of Trust:
Field Notes from a Research on Aging in Villages


Parfenova O.A.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Researcher, Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia oparfenova@socinst.ru

ID of the Article:


The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-78-10118.


For citation:

Parfenova O.A. Crisis of Trust: Field Notes from a Research on Aging in Villages. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 12. P. 132-139



Abstract

This article presents field notes from the qualitative sociological investigation of aging in rural Russian villages, offering an ethnographic perspective on the everyday practices and lived experiences of older adults amid structural and cultural transformations. The research frames aging as a process embedded in multi-scalar social relations, where kinship networks, neighborly support, and informal reciprocity function within a shrinking infrastructure of welfare provision and collective resources. When conducting research on aging in Russian villages, we encountered familiar barriers such as recruiting informants, obtaining support from authorities and relatives, and facing cognitive or physical difficulties of older participants; however, all of these proved less significant than the issue of trust, which emerged as central during initial contact. Field observations and interviews revealed that distrust had multiple dimensions: firsthand experience with widespread fraud [often involving direct encounters with scammers] and latent fears about being questioned on sensitive or prohibited topics, especially those related to the current conflict. This pervasive sense of alienation and distrust was further exacerbated by the pandemic and self-isolation measures, which, though brief, left a lasting imprint of anxiety and habitual distancing. The study contributes to rural gerontology by problematizing idealized conceptions of village solidarity, demonstrating the layered crisis of trust and the need for nuanced, context-sensitive researchers interventions that respect local lifeworlds and epistemologies of aging.


Keywords
trust, aging in the village; autoethnography; role in the field; special military operation (SMO)

References

Голубева Е. Ю., Хабарова Л. Г., Соловьев А. Г. Приемная семья как новая технология ухода в политике активного старения в отдаленных северных территориях // Экология человека. 2017. № 11. С. 42–46. [Golubeva Е. Yu., Khabarova L G., Soloviev А. G. (2017) Foster Family as a New Nurcing Technology in the Policy of Ageing in the Remote Northern Areas. Ekologiya cheloveka [Human Ecology]. No. 11: 42–46. (In Russ.)]

Галкин К. Особенности нерационального социологического интервью: если у информанта диагноз «деменция» // Laboratorium: Журнал Социальных Исследований. 2020. Т. 12. № 2. С. 212–220. [Galkin K. (2020) Features of an “Irrational” Sociological Interview: if the Informant Is Diagnosed with Dementia. Laboratorium: Zhurnal Socialnyh Issledovanii [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research]. Vol. 12. No. 2: 212–220. (In Russ.)]

Горожане в деревне. Социологические исследования в российской глубинке: дезурбанизация и сельско-городские сообщества / Под ред. В. И. Ильина, Н. Е. Покровского. М.: Универ. книга, 2016. [City Dwellers in the Countryside. Sociological Research in the Russian Hinterland: Deurbanization and Rural-Urban Communities. (2016) Ed. by V. I. Ilyin, N. E. Pokrovsky. Moscow: Univer. kniga. (In Russ.)]

Покровский Н. Е. Социологическая экспедиция как исследовательская практика и форма обучения полевой работе // Laboratorium: Журнал Социальных Исследований. 2015. Т. 7. № 2. C. 171–181. [Pokrovsky N. E. (2015) The Sociological Expedition as Research Practice and a Form of Hands-On Fieldwork Training. Laboratorium: Zhurnal Socialnyh Issledovanii [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research]. Vol. 7. No. 2: 171–181. (In Russ.)]

Рогозин Д. М. Ограничения и возможности сельского старения // Крестьяноведение. 2018. Т. 3. № 2. C. 86–101. [Rogozin D. M. (2018) Challenges and Prospects of Rural Aging. Krest’yanovedenie [Russian Peasant Studies]. Vol. 3. No.2: 171–181. (In Russ.)]

Dibartolo M. C., McCrone S. (2023) Recruitment of Rural Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Barriers, Challenges, and Strategies. Aging Mental Health. Vol. 7. No. 2: 75–82.

Lee S.-J., Parrott K. R. et al. (2025) Aging-in-Place Challenges for Rural Older Adults: Responses from Service Providers. Sage Open Aging. Vol. 11. DOI: 10.1177/30495334251328090.

Phillipson C., Scharf T. (2005) Rural and Urban Perspectives on Growing Old: Developing a New Research Agenda. European journal of ageing. Vol. 2. No. 2: 67–75.

Poulin L. I., Skinner M. W., Hanlon N. (2020) Rural Gerontological Health: Emergent Questions for Research, Policy and Practice. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 258.Rural Gerontology: Towards Critical Perspectives on Rural Ageing. (2020) Ed. by M. Skinner, R. Winterton, K. Walsh. London: Routledge.

Skinner M. W., Winterton R. (2018) Interrogating the Contested Spaces of Rural Aging: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice. Gerontologist. Vol. 58. No.1:15–25.

 

Content No 12, 2025