printThe Debate on the Civilizational Approach:
Essentialism, Constructivism and Contemporary Historical Sociology
Maslovskii M.V.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Lead Researcher, Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia m.maslovsky@hse.ru
The research was carried out under the grant of the RSF, project No. 23-18-01067.
Maslovskii M.V. The Debate on the Civilizational Approach: Essentialism, Constructivism and Contemporary Historical Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 5. P. 80-89
The article presents a critical review of the debate on civilizational identity in contemporary social science. The theory of clash of civilizations is discussed as an example of the essentialist approach to that problem. It is argued in the article that this approach did not make a substantial theoretical contribution to civilizational analysis and lacks empirical confirmation. Social constructivism represents an alternative to the essentialist approach. From the constructivist perspective civilizations are characterized as imagined communities. However, that perspective displays some limitations in conducting empirical research. It has been argued that civilizational identity can be studied with the same methodological tools as any other form of identity. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that civilizational identity in today’s societies is generally weaker than its national or regional forms. The article highlights the peculiarities of civilizational analysis in contemporary historical sociology. It is emphasized that this approach occupies an intermediate position between essentialism and constructivism. The article makes a conclusion that historical civilizations – from the axial age to modern times – can be discussed from the essentialist perspective although these civilizations were more changeable than essentialism supposes. At the same time studies of civilizational identity in today’s societies should draw on a moderate version of constructivism.
Arnason J. (2021) Civilizational Patterns and Civilizing Processes. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
Arnason J. P. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill.
Arnason J. P. (2020) The Labyrinth of Modernity: Horizons, Pathways and Mutations. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bettiza G. (2014) Civilizational Analysis in International Relations: Mapping the Field and Advancing a “Civilizational Politics” Line of Research. International Studies Review. Vol. 16. No. 1: 1–28.
Bettiza G., Petito F. (2018) Why (Clash of) Civilizations Discourses Just Won’t Go Away? Understanding the Civilizational Politics of Our Times. In: Orsi D. (ed.) The “Clash of Civilizations” 25 Years on: A Multidisciplinary Appraisal. Bristol: E-International Relations: 37–51.
Blackburn M. (2021) Mainstream Russian Nationalism and the “State- Civilization” Identity: Perspectives from Below. Nationalities Papers. Vol. 49. No. 1: 89–107.
Braslavskiy R. G., Kozlovskiy V. V. (2023) Civilizational Turn in the Contemporary Sociology: The Contribution of S. N. Eisenstadt. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 116–125. (In Russ.)
Casanova J. (2011) Cosmopolitanism, the Clash of Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Current Sociology. Vol. 59. No. 2: 252–267.
Coker C. (2019) The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge: Polity.
Collins R. (2001) Civilizations as Zones of Prestige and Social Contact. International Sociology. Vol. 16. No. 3: 421–437.
Hale H., Laruelle M. (2020) Rethinking Civilizational Identity from the Bottom up: A Case Study of Russia and a Research Agenda. Nationalities Papers. Vol. 48. No. 3: 585–602.
Hale H., Laruelle M. (2021) A New Wave of Research on Civilizational Politics. Nationalities Papers. Vol. 49. No. 4: 597–608.
Haug S., Roychoudhury S. (2023) Civilizational Exceptionalism in International Affairs: Making Sense of Indian and Turkish Claims. International Affairs. Vol. 99. No. 2: 531–549.
Huntington S. (2003) The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
Ilyin V. I. (2024) Local Civilization as an Imagined Community. In: Braslavskiy R. G., Malinov A. V. (eds.) Civilizational Diversity of the Contemporary World. Moscow, St. Petersburg: FNISC RAN: 348–366. (In Russ.)
Ionov I. N. (2007) Civilizational Consciousness and Historical Knowledge: The Problems of Interaction. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Kapustin B. G. (2009) The Political Meanings of Civilization. Political Conceptology: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. No. 3: 23–48. (In Russ.)
Karbainov N. I., Galindabaeva V. V. (2021) Civilizational Historical Discourses in Post- Soviet Tatarstan: The Commemorative Projects of Elites and Mass Perceptions. In: Kozlovskiy V. V. (ed.) (2021) Russian Society: Architectonics of Civilizational Development. Moscow, St. Petersburg: FNISC RAN: 175–247. (In Russ.)
Katzenstein P. (2010) A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices. In: Katzenstein P. (ed.) Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. New York: Routledge: 1–40.
Katzenstein P. (2012) China’s Rise: Rupture, Return or Recombination? In: Katzenstein P. (ed.) Sinicization and the Rise of China: Civilizational Processes Beyond East and West. Abingdon: Routledge: 1–38.
Knöbl W. (2017) The Sociological Discourse on “Modernization” and “Modernity”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. No. 3: 311–329.
Letnyakov D. E. (2021) Civilizations as “Imagined Communities”: Towards a Constructivist Critique of Civilizational Theory. Lichnost’. Kul’tura, Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 23. Iss. 3: 57–69. (In Russ.)
Lomanov A. V. (2025) All- Humanity China and the Abstract West. Rossiya v global’noi politike [Russia in Global Politics]. Vol. 23. No. 2: 207–226. (In Russ.)
Maslovskiy M. V. (2022) Contemporary Civilizational Analysis in Historical Sociology: Problems and Prospects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 3–12. (In Russ.)
Smith J. (2017) Debating Civilisations: Interrogating Civilisational Analysis in a Global Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Smith J. (2024) Civilizational Analysis as a Mode of the Intercultural: Intercivilizational Encounters, the Intercultural and Contemporary Historical Sociology. Journal of Intercultural Studies. Vol. 45. No. 2: 310–325.
Therborn G. (2015) The World: Beginners’ Guide. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Therborn G. (2021) States, Nations and Civilizations. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 14. No. 2: 225–242.