printConceptual Reconstruction of V. M. Khvostov's Sociological Views
Shmerlina I.A.
r. Sci. (Sociol.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia shmerlina@yandex.ru
Shmerlina I.A. Conceptual Reconstruction of V. M. Khvostov's Sociological Views. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2025. No 9. P. 79-88
The article analyzes the sociological views of V. M. Khvostov in two conceptual perspectives – semiotic and the perspective of formal tradition. Both are connected with the assertion of a realistic approach to the problem of social ontology, which comes into some contradiction with the psychological motives of Khvostov’s sociological work. The semiotic theme as a theme of external manifestation of human states and intentions was provoked by the problematic of “alien animation” popular in the Russian intellectual community since the late 19th century. This line was continued but did not receive theoretical completion in P. Sorokin’s concept of “conductors of interaction”. Khvostov’s turn to the theme of social forms was influenced by G. Simmel, despite Khvostov’s highly critical attitude to the latter’s formalist intuitions. Khvostov’s interest in the problems of “stable social formations or public unions” manifested itself in the identification of “social typology” as one of two branches of sociology. Khvostov’s division of “public unions” into spontaneous (causal) and organized associations deserves special attention. In the first case, we can talk about natural social forms, in the second – about institutional ones. Viewed from the selected theoretical perspectives, it would be premature to characterize Khvostov’s sociological ideas as holistic concepts, however, both the semiotic and formalistic intuitions of the scientist make a significant contribution to their formation.
Durkheim E. (1991) On the division of social labor. In: On the division of social labor. Method of sociology. Moscow: Nauka: 3–390. (In Russ.)
Golosenko I. A., Kozlovsky V. V. (1995) History of Russian Sociology of the XIX–XX centuries. Moscow: Onega. (In Russ.)
Kareev N. I. (1996) Fundamentals of Russian Sociology. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo I. Limbakha. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V. M. (1909а) Predmet i metod sotsiologii [The subject and method of sociology]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology]. Book IV(99): 619–635. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V. M. (1909b). [A social organism]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology]. Book V(100): 357–394. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V. M. (1917). Klassifikatsiya nauk i mesto sotsiologii v sisteme nauchnogo znaniya [Classification of sciences and the place of sociology in the system of scientific knowledge]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology]. Book IV–V(139–140): 69–126. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V. M. (1918). Sotsial’naya svyaz’ [Social bond]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii [Questions of philosophy and psychology]. Book I–II (141–142): 49–84. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V. M. (1923) Osnovy sotsiologii. Ucheniye o zakonomernosti obshchestvennykh protsessov. Elementarnyy ocherk [Fundamentals of sociology. The doctrine of the regularity of social processes. Elementary essay]. Moscow: Russkiy knizhnik. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V. M. (2011) Sociology: Historical essay on theories of society. 2nd ed. Moscow: LIBROKOM. (In Russ.)
Popper K. (2002) Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Transl. from Eng. by D. G. Lahuti; ed. by V. N. Sadovsky. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)
Shmerlina I. A. (2006) Semiotic concept of sociality: problem statement. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Sociological Journal]. No. 3/4: 45–25. (In Russ.)
Shmerlina I. A. (2022) Sociology of Social Forms: Reassembling the Theory. Moscow: FNISTS RAN. (In Russ.)
Sorokin P. A. (1920) Sistema sotsiologii [The System of Sociology]. Vol. 1. P. 1. Petrograd: Izd. t-vo “KOLOS”. (In Russ.)
Vvedensky A. (1892) O predelakh i priznakakh odushevleniya. Novyy psikho-fiziologicheskiy zakon v svyazi s voprosom o vozmozhnosti metafiziki [On the limits and signs of animation. A new psychophysiological law in connection with the question of the possibility of metaphysics]. St. Petersburg: Tipografiya V. S. Balasheva. (In Russ.)