Generational Shifts in Generalized Trust? Russia in the European Context

Generational Shifts in Generalized Trust? Russia in the European Context


Almakaeva A.M.

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Head of the Centre for Comparative Research on Social Wellbeing, HSE University, Moscow, Russia aalmakaeva@hse.ru

ID of the Article:


The article is an output of HSE-BR-2025-52 research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at HSE University.


For citation:

Almakaeva A.M. Generational Shifts in Generalized Trust? Russia in the European Context. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2026. No 10. P. 44-56



Abstract

This article examines the dynamics of generalized trust in Russia between 2006 and 2024 and tests the hypothesis that generational replacement contributes to its change over time. The study is based on the R. Inglehart and C. Welzel’s theory of modernization and their argument about generational replacement as a key driver of value change. The analysis uses all available waves of the European Social Survey and the Russian Social Survey. Generalized trust is measured through a composite index based on three items: whether most people can be trusted, whether most people are fair, and whether people are generally willing to help one another. Generations are distinguished using V. Radaev’s typology, including his more recent distinction between older and younger millennials. In the European context, Russia consistently occupies an intermediate position throughout the observation period: Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden show the highest levels of trust, while Bulgaria ranks among the lowest. The findings reveal a stable upward trend in generalized trust in Russia which, in comparative perspective, is one of the most pronounced in Europe. The only noticeable downturn occurs in the tenth “COVID” wave collected in 2021; by 2024 trust levels have returned to their pre‑pandemic levels. The results show a weak increase in generalized trust both across the life course and among the youngest cohorts. Overall, the study shows that, even when compared to basic human values, generalized trust is an exceptionally stable phenomenon that evolves very slowly over time.


Keywords
generations; generalized trust; exogenous shocks; modernization theory; European Social Survey; Russian Social Survey

References

Algan Y., Cahuc P. (2013) Trust and growth. Annual Review of Economics. Vol. 5. No. 1: 521–549. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-082912-110106.

Almakaeva A. (2014) Measuring generalized trust in cross-cultural research. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 32–43. EDN: TCWEQB. (In Russ.)

Almakaeva A., Welzel C., Ponarin E. (2017) Human empowerment and trust in strangers: the multilevel evidence. In: Social Indicators Research: 923–962. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1508-1.

Almakaeva A.M., Mavletova A.M. (2018) Modernization processes in Russia: should we expect a shift toward emancipative values? Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 6(148): 91–112. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.05; EDN: YZYHZB. (In Russ.)

Almakaeva A.M., Volchenko O.V. (2018) The dynamics of social capital in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4(146): 273-292. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.1; EDN: XZPHPN. (In Russ.)

Beilmann M., Lilleoja L., Realo A. (2021) Learning to trust: trends in generalized social trust in the three Baltic countries from 1990 to 2018. In: Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being: Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Ed. by A. Almakaeva, A. Moreno, R. Wilkes. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 19–43. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78334-8_2.

Beugelsdijk S., de Groot H.L., van Schaik A.B. (2004) Trust and economic growth: a robustness analysis. Oxford Economic Papers. Vol. 56. No. 1: 118–134. DOI: 10.1093/oep/56.1.118.

Calvo R., Zheng Y., Kumar S., Olgiati A., Berkman L. (2012) Well-being and social capital on planet Earth: cross-national evidence from 142 countries. PLoS ONE. Vol. 7. No. 8: e42793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042793.

Clark A.K., Eisenstein M.A. (2013) Interpersonal trust: an age–period–cohort analysis revisited. Social Science Research. Vol. 42. No. 2: 361–375. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.001.

Coleman J.S. (1994) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Delhey J., Newton K. (2003) Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies. Vol. 5. No. 2: 93–137. DOI: 10.1080/1461669032000072256.

Delhey J., Newton K. (2005) Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review. Vol. 21. No. 4: 311–327. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci022.

Delhey J., Newton K., Welzel C. (2011) How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review. Vol. 76. No. 5: 786–807. DOI: 10.1177/0003122411420817.

Delhey J., Welzel C. (2012) Generalizing trust: what extends trust from ingroups to outgroups? World Values Research. Vol. 5. No. 3: 45–69.

Gao X., Ma H. (2025) Changing trends of Chinese people’s generalized trust: a dynamic analysis of the age-period-cohort effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica. Vol. 57. No. 3: 463–476. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.00463.

Glatz C., Eder A. (2020) Patterns of trust and subjective well-being across Europe: new insights from repeated cross-sectional analyses based on the European Social Survey 2002–2016. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 148. No. 2: 417–439. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02212-x.

Guo Q., Zheng W. et al. (2022) Social trust more strongly associated with well-being in individualistic societies. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 188: 111451. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111451.

Hardin R. (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2011) Modernizatsiya, kulturnye izmeneniya i demokratiya: posledovatelnost chelovecheskogo razvitiya [Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence]. Moscow: Novoe izd-vo. EDN: QOMHTL. (In Russ.)

Kaminska O. (2020) Guide to Using Weights and Sample Design Indicators with ESS Data. European Social Survey.

Kozyreva P.M., Smirnov A.I. (2019) Trust in an unstable Russian society. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 5: 134–147. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.10; EDN: IZQWEY. (In Russ.)

Kozyreva P.M., Smirnov A.I. (2025) Trust as a social problem. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. Vol. 68. No. 3: 38–61. DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2025-68-3-38-61; EDN: DNWPQF. (In Russ.)

Kuchenkova A.V., Tatarova G.G. (2019) “Life cycle stage” as a determinant of an individual’s subjective well-being. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 30–43. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006135-1; EDN: NVRSHV. (In Russ.)

Latov Yu.V. (2010) Kakov sootsial’nyy kapital sovremennoy Rossii? (sravnitel’nyy analiz mezhlichnostnogo i institutsional’nogo doveriya [What is the social capital of contemporary Russia? (a comparativeanalysis of interpersonal and institutional trust)]. In: Ekonomika i instituty [Economics and Institutions]. Ed. by A.P. Zaostrovtsev. St. Petersburg: MCSEI «Leont’evskii tsentr»: 216–230. EDN: YFPGXB. (In Russ.)

Magun V.S. (2023) The evolution of basic values of the Russian population, 2006–2021. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 44–58. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029336-2; EDN: RIAJNU. (In Russ.)

Mannheim K. (2000) Problema pokolenii [The problem of generations]. In: Ocherki sotsiologii znaniya: Problema pokolenij. Sostyazatelnost. Ekonomicheskie ambitsii [Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: The Problem of Generations. Competition. Economic Ambitions]. Moscow: INION RAN: 8–63. (In Russ.)

O’Rand A.M., Krecker M.L. (1990) Concepts of the life cycle: their history, meanings, and uses in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 16. No. 1: 241–262. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001325.

Putnam R.D. (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Radaev V.V. (2023) Millennials: How Russian Society Is Changing. Moscow: VShE. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598- 2792-4; EDN: RWCXHG. (In Russ.)

Ryzhova S.V. (2021) Generalized trust and feelings toward Russia as components of all-Russian identity. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsialnaya praktika [Sociological Science and Social Practice]. Vol. 9. No. 2: 27–41. DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2021.9.2.8101; EDN: LMEHBF. (In Russ.)

Ryzhova S.V. (2025) The dynamics of generalized trust: attitudes of Russians in a period of external pressure. Informatsionno-analiticheskij byulleten INAB [INAB Information and Analytical Bulletin]. No. 2: 4–12. DOI: 10.19181/INAB.2025.2.1; EDN: APUGWX. (In Russ.)

Sasaki M., Davydenko V.A. et al. (2010) Trust as an element of social capital in contemporary Russia (a comparative analysis). Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. Vol. 19. No. 2: 78–97. EDN: NDSVZJ. (In Russ.)

Schwadel P., Stout M. (2012) Age, period and cohort effects on social capital. Social Forces. Vol. 91. No. 1: 233–252. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sos119.

Seifert N. (2018) Yet another case of Nordic exceptionalism? Extending existing evidence for a causal relationship between institutional and social trust to the Netherlands and Switzerland. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 136. No. 2: 539–555. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-017-1553-5.

Shabunova A.A., Kosygina K.E., Belekhova G.V. (2021) Trust and social inequality: the Russian case. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4: 186–211. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.4.1785; EDN: LXQYUM. (In Russ.)

Sønderskov K.M., Dinesen P.T. (2014) Danish exceptionalism: explaining the unique increase in social trust over the past 30 years. European Sociological Review. Vol. 30. No. 6: 782–795. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcu073.

Stolle D. (2002) Trusting strangers – the concept of generalized trust in perspective. Austrian Journal of Political Science. Vol. 31. No. 4: 397–412.

Sturgis P., Smith P. (2010) Assessing the validity of generalized trust questions: what kind of trust are we measuring? International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Vol. 22. No. 1: 74–92. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edp035.

Turovsky R.F., Bragina E.V. (2024) Factors of social trust in Europe and Russia. Politiya: zhurnal politicheskoj filosofii i sotsiologii politiki [Politeia: Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics]. No. 1 (112): 136–163. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2024-112-1-136-163; EDN: HMEKGS. (In Russ.)

Uslaner E.M. (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Uslaner E.M. (2013) Trust and corruption revisited: how and why trust and corruption shape each other. Quality & Quantity. Vol. 47. No. 6: 3603–3608. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9752-y.

Welzel C. (2017) Freedom Rising. Moscow: VCIOM. EDN: YORVXP. (In Russ.)

Whiteley P.F. (2000) Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies. Vol. 48. No. 3: 443–466. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00269.

Winship C., Harding D.J. (2008) Analyzing age-period-cohort data: a review and critique. Sociological Methods & Research. Vol. 36. No. 3: 287–328. DOI: 10.1177/0049124106292364.

Yamagishi T. (2011) Trust: The Evolutionary Game of Mind and Society. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-53936-0.

Content No 10, 2026