Max Weber on the Role of Protestantism in the Formation of Civil Political Culture in the United States

Max Weber on the Role of Protestantism in the Formation of Civil Political Culture in the United States


Schwinn T.

Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Prof., Director of the Max-Weber-Institute of Sociology, University Heidelberg Thomas.schwinn@soziologie.uni-heidelberg.de

ID of the Article:


For citation:

Schwinn T. Max Weber on the Role of Protestantism in the Formation of Civil Political Culture in the United States. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2020. No 6. P. 42-50




Abstract

In “Protestant sects and the spirit of capitalism” (1906), Max Weber described Puritan immigrant communities as one of the origins of the American culture of social, business, and political relations. In the United States there was no state Church and there was no monopoly in the spiritual field, and the person’s belonging to the Protestant sect acted as a guarantee of moral and business integrity. The religious ideas of immigrants from Europe about their mission in building the Kingdom of God in the territories of the North American States were transformed into the ideology of integration of the new nation. The ascetic economic ethics of Puritanism and the individualistic, anti-authoritarian and democratic character of Protestant communities were transmitted to the political institutions of the United States, which favored the establishment of democracy and federalism in American society.


Keywords
political sociology of M. Weber; religion and politics; USA and modernization; multiple modernities; protestant sects; puritanism; federalism

References

Casanova J. (2008) Public Religions Revisited. In: de Vries H. Religion. Beyond a Concept. New York: Fordham University Press: 101–119.

Eisenstadt S.N. (2011) Die Vielfalt der Moderne. 3. Aufl. [The Diversity of Modernity. 3d ed.] Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. (In Germ.).

Hecht M. (1998) Modernität und Bürgerlichkeit [Modernity and Civility]. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt. (In Germ.)

Heideking J. (2002) Fragment of Europe or Historical Innovation? The Emergence of Modernity in the United States after independence. In: Roniger L., Weismann L.H. (eds) Globality and Multiple Modernities. Comparative North American and Latin American Perspectives. Brighton; Portland: Sussex: 66–78.

Höllinger F. (1996) Volksreligion und Herrschaftskirche. Die Wurzeln religiösen Verhaltens in westlichen Gesellschaften [Popular Religion and Dominant Church. The Roots of Religious Behavior in Western Societies]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. (In Germ.)

Kamphausen G. (1991) Das Bekenntnis zur Selbst-Evidenz. Über das Verhältnis von Politik und Religion in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika [The Commitment to Self-evidence. On the Relationship between Politics and Religion in the United States of America]. In: Thomas H. (Hg.) Amerika – eine Hoffnung, zwei Visionen [America – One Hope, Two Visions]. Herford: Busse + Seewald: 251–276. (In Germ.)

Kamphausen G. (1990) ”Ideengeschichtliche Ursprünge und Einflüsse“ [“Origins and Influences in the History of Ideas”]. In: Adams W.P. et al. (Hrsg.) Länderbericht USA I [Country Report USA I] Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: 219–238. (In Germ.)

Loader C., Alexander J.C. (1985) Max Weber on Churches and Sects in North America. An Alternative Path toward Rationalization. Sociological Theory. No. 3: 66–78.

Mommsen W. (1974) Max Weber. Gesellschaft, Politik und Geschichte [Max Weber. Society, Politics and History]. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. (In Germ.)

Offe C. (2004) Selbstbetrachtung aus der Ferne. Tocqueville, Weber und Adorno in den Vereinigten Staaten [Outside Observation. Tocqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States]. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. (In Germ.)

Ostendorf B. (2010) Die historische Ursache der religiösen Vielfalt in den USA [The Historical Cause of Religious Diversity in the USA]. In: Reder M., Rugel M. (Hrsg.) Religion und die umstrittene Moderne [Religion and the Controversial Modern Age]. Stuttgart: Kohlkammer: 66–88. (In Germ.)

Ostendorf B., Levine P. (1990) Die amerikanische Definition von Kultur und die Definition der amerikanischen Kultur [The American Definition of Culture and Definition of American Culture]. In: Adams W.P. et al. (Hrsg.) Länderbericht USA II [Country Report USA II]. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: 449–458. (In Germ.)

Riesebrodt M. (1990) Der protestantische Rahmen [The Protestant Framework]. In: Adams W.P. et al. (Hrsg.) Länderbericht USA II [Country Report USA II]. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: 469–485. (In Germ.)

Schwinn T. (2013) Zur Neubestimmung des Verhältnisses von Religion und Moderne. Säkularisierung, Differenzierung und multiple Modernitäten [On the Redefinition of the Relationship between Religion and Modernity]. In: Wolf C., König M. (Hrsg.) Religion und Gesellschaft. Sonderheft 53 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS) [Religion and Society. Special Iss. 53 of KZfSS]. Wiesbaden: Springer: 73–97. (In Germ.)

Torpey J. (2009) The Problem of “American Exceptionalism” Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology. No. 9: 143–168.

Weber M. (1978) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Band 1. 7. Aufl. [Collected Essays in the Sociology of Religion. Vol. 1. 7th ed.]. Tübingen: C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). (In Germ.)

Winkler H.A. (2009) Geschichte des Westens. Von der Aufklärung in der Antike bis zum 20. Jahrhundert [History of the West. From the Enlightenment in Antiquity to the 20th Century]. München: Beck. (In Germ.)

Content No 6, 2020