Polemical notes on purposeful accentuations in alternative social and economic strategy
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Laboratory on Comparative Studies of Socio-Economic Systems at the Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Chief Researcher, Institute of Economy, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia email@example.com
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Director of the Center for Modern Marxist Studies, Prof., Department of Political Economy, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Head Researcher, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Visiting Prof., University of Cambridge (Cambridge, UK), Hainan Normal University (Haikou, P.R. China) and Harbin University (Harbin, P.R. China), Moscow, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
On the base of a diagnosis set in the previous article of the existing state of socio-economic body of our country, the authors conduct a comparative study of the two possible trajectories of socio-economic development of Russia: (1) strategies focused on restoration and modernization of primarily industrial basis, and (2) the strategy of advancing (leading) development subordinated to priority objectives of developing human qualities (“Economics for humans”). Specifics of the second model are discussed – its objectives and means of implementation, available resources and potential social actors to implement it.