Erosion of socio-cultural capital in South Eastern Europe
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Head of Marine Management and Logistics Department of University of Montenegro, Kotor, Montenegro firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of doctoral studies, Mediteranian University Podgorica, editor in chief of „Economics and Economy“, Podgorica, Montenegro email@example.com
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of doctoral studies, Maritime faculty of Kotor, University of Montenegro, editor in chief of firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Kaunas Faculty of Humanities, Vilnius University, editor in chief of „Transformations in Business & Economics”, Kaunas, Lithuania email@example.com
In this paper authors consider the perception of respondents on a) the level of the quality of social and cultural capital in selected countries in South-Eastern Europe – Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro, and b) the degree of negative impact on the social and cultural capital of following general factors: deficit of institutional change, neo-liberal quasi-institutional monism and path dependence. The aim is to explain in what ways social and cultural capital is associated with various factors, as well as their role in causing the crisis effects in society. It is assumed that these factors in varying degrees, directly and predominantly affect the society, cause inefficiency, and erosion of social and cultural capital, and therefore create the transition crisis, and unsatisfactory rates of development. The starting hypothesis has been fully proven using the multi linear regression analysis and a multiple hierarchical regression analysis. In addition, it is shown that a linear relationship explains well the functional dependencies that were studied, and that the authors have correctly identified the key independent variables (factors) that significantly influence the dependent variable (socio-cultural capital).
Манн М. Власть в XXI столетии. Mосква: Высшая школа экономики, 2014 [Mann M. (2014) The authorities in the XXI century. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki. (In Russ.)].
Acemoglu D. et al. (2003) Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Simptoms: Volatility, Crises and Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. No. 50: 49–123.
Arthur W. B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Coleman J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology. No. 94 (Supplement): S95-S120.
David P. A. (1994) Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations, and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. No. 5: 205–220.
Frydman R., Rapaczynski A., Murphy K. (1998) Krade se država, pa i sve u njoj. Banka. No. 9 (11): 63–67.
Greif A. (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodgson G. M. (2006) Institutions, Recessions and Recovery in the Transitional Economies. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 15. No. 4: 875–894.
Jovovic R. (2012) Global financial crisis: role of international institutional framework, and lesson for transitional countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Vol. 8, No. 3: 65–76.
Landes D. S. (1998) The wealth and poverty of nations: why some countries are so rich and some so poor. New York: WW Norton.
Marcouiller D., Young L. (1995) The Black hole of graft: the predatory state and the informal economy. American Economic Review. No. 3: 630–646.
Perroux F. (1969) Independence de l’economie nationalee et interdependence des natoins. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.
Polterovich V. (2012) Reform Design: How to Search for Interim Institutions. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Vol. 8. No. 2: 25–44.
Stiglitz J. (2000) Formal and Informal Institutions. In: Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Edited by Dasgupta, P. & Serageldin, I. Washington: The World Bank: 59–70.