On the way to social singularistics: analysis of the phenomenon of provocation

On the way to social singularistics: analysis of the phenomenon of provocation

Zadorozhnyuk I.E.

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Researcher, National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, Moscow, Russia zador46@yandex.ru

ID of the Article:

For citation:

Zadorozhnyuk I.E. On the way to social singularistics: analysis of the phenomenon of provocation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 1. P. 152-158


The problems of provocation are considered, for the first time at the level of the scientific monograph presented by the sociologist A.V. Dmitriev and the philosopher A.A. Sychev. It emphasizes the peculiarity of the scientific study of singular phenomena, especially those that have a powerful impact on social processes. The role of provocations in political life is particularly noted, and it is stressed that, firstly, they do not determine the course of events in one direction or another (“history itself uses provocateurs,” the authors argue), and secondly, their impact can be nullified. The treatment of provocation as a manifestation (objectification) of the paradoxical consciousness is considered. As an illustrative material highlighting the role of provocations in history, an analysis is given of the threshold of the First World War in 1914 and the colored revolutions, one of which occurred in 2014 in Ukraine. The review poses the problem of creating an intersubjective area of social singularity. The urgency of a comprehensive study of the phenomenon of provocation, taking into account its social consequences, is emphasized.

provocation; scandal; singularistics; social analysis; destructiveness; balance


Dmitriev A.V., Sychev A.A. (2014). Scandal. Sociophilosophical essays. Moscow: TsSPM. (In Russ.)

Dmitriev A.V., Sychev A.A. (2017). Provocation. Sociophilosophical essays. Moscow: TsSPM. (In Russ)

Grey J. (2016). The Anomaly of Barbarism // Lapham’s Quaterly. No. 2. Spring www.laphamsquaterly.org/disaster/ anomaly-barbarism.

Marx K., Engels F. Works. (1957). Second Edition. M.: State Publishing House of Political Literature, 1957. Vol. 8. (In Russ.)

Struve P.B. (1913, 1916) Economy and Price: Critical Research on the Theory and History of Economic Life. Part 1–2. SPb., Moscow: Publishing of V.P. Ryabushinsky. (In Russ.)

Sheregi F.E. (2014). Gnoseological models in sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. № 11: 71–82. (in Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (2008a). Okhlokratiya: a resurgent phenomenon? Sotsiologiia teoriia metodologiia marketing [Sociology: theory, methodology, marketing]. No. 2: 26–36. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (2008b). Paradoxical Man. M .: UNITY-DANA. (In Russ.)

Toshchenko Zh.T. (2015). Fantoms of Russian Society. М .: TsSPM. (In Russ.)

Zadorozhnyuk E.G. (2015). Revolutions of a new type: from “in vitro” to “in natura”. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with time]. No. 52: 33–52. (In Russ.)

Zadorozhnyuk E.G., Zadorozhnyuk I.E. (2017). Unsolved Lessons of the Prelude to the First World War. Svobodnaia mysl [Free thought]. No. 5. (In Russ.)

Content No 1, 2018