New research orientations in sociology of childhood

New research orientations in sociology of childhood

Filipova A.G.

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Head of Laboratory for Integrated Childhood Research, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, Vladivostok, Russia

Rakitina N.E.

Leading Engineer, Department of educational process support, Komsomolsk-on-Amur State Technical University, Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Russia

Kupryashkina E.A.

Postgraduate Student, Department of Social Sciences, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia

ID of the Article:

For citation:

Filipova A.G., Rakitina N.E., Kupryashkina E.A. New research orientations in sociology of childhood. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2018. No 3. P. 86-93


The article reviews foreign research in the field of children’s geographies and sociology of childhood. The field of children geographies has emerged since S. James’ article in the journal “Area” in 1990. Children geographies is the branch of human geography. It deals with the study of places and spaces of children lives. It has been influenced by ideas of new sociology of childhood, such as plurality of the children’s worlds, child-actor, the participating method, etc. The aim of the review is to mark out features of new socio-geographical research direction. These features are new methods, new concepts, new research fields etc. The empirical base for the review was formed by the articles of two international journals – “Children Geographies” and “Childhood”. In addition “Journal of environmental psychology”, “Children and society”, “Children, Youth and Environments”, and monographs of foreign authors were analyzed. As a result of study five main directions of socio-geographical research of childhood were offered. They are a children game and its spaces, children and street, children mobilities, child-friendly cities, childhood and space at macro social level. Socio-graphical direction of the childhood study solves not only a task of spaces and places representations of childhood, but also a task of comprehending gaps between the world of children and the world of adults. In the Russian sociological practice the socio-geographical direction at this moment is poorly presented. In the available works the childhood is investigated at the local level of a city or of a city district. So foreign research can give methodological reference points and provide domestic scientists with necessary methods and even the developed tools, give them empirical material for comparative research.

new sociology of childhood; children’s geographies; geographical turn; research methods


Бесчасная А.А. Паттерны урбанистического детства как отражение многообразия повседневности городских детей // Общество: социология, психология, педагогика. 2016. № 1. С. 26– 29. [Beschasnaja A.A. (2016) Patterns of urban childhood as a reflection of the diversity of the daily routine of urban children. Obshhestvo: sociologija, psihologija, pedagogika [Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy]. No. 1: 26–29. (In Russ.)]

Майорова-Щеглова С.Н. Социализирующее пространство города: методика социального картографирования // Педагогическая диагностика. 2013. № 1. С. 61–75. [Majorova-Shheglova S.N. (2013) The socializing space of the city: the methodology of social mapping. Pedagogicheskaja diagnostika. [Pedagogical diagnostics]. No. 1: 61–75. (In Russ.)]

Ракитина Н.Э. Городские ресурсы и риски: детский взгляд (на примере городов российского Дальнего Востока) // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2017. № 4. С. 32–35. [Rakitina N. Je. (2017) Urban resources and risks: a child’s view (on the example of the city of the Far East). Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. [Theory and practice of social development]. No. 4: 32–35. (In Russ.)]

Сибирева М.Ю. Ранняя социализация в городской среде // Автореферат дис. кандидата социологических наук. Санкт-Петербург, 2011. [Sibireva M. Ju. (2011) Early socialization in the urban environment. Avtoreferat dis. kandidata sociologicheskih nauk. Sankt-Peterburg. [Abstract of the dis. Candidate of sociological sciences. St. Petersburg]. (In Russ.)]

Филипова А.Г. Социальное пространство детства: принципы маркирования территорий // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2012. Т. 10. № 1. С. 79–94. [Filipova A.G. (2012) Social space of childhood: principles of marking territories. Zhurnal issledovanij social’noj politiki. [Journal of Social Policy Studies]. No. 1: 79–94. (In Russ.)]

Adamc J., Hillman M., Whitelegg J. (1990) One False Move: a Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.

Alarasi H., Martinez J., Amer S. (2016) Children’s perception of their city centre: a qualitative GIS methodological investigation in a Dutch city. Children’s Geographies. No. 14: 437–452.

Benwell M. (2013) Rethinking conceptualizations of adult-imposed restriction and children’s experiences of autonomy in outdoor space. Children’s geographies. No. 1: 28–43.

Burns A., Homel R. (1985) Through a child’s eyes: quality of Neighbourgood and Quality of life. In: Living in cities: Urbanism and Society in Metropolitan Australia. I. Burnley and J. Forrest, (eds). Sydney: Allen & Unwin: 103–115.

Chatterjee S. (2005) Children’s friendship with Place: A Conceptual Inquiry. Children, Youth and Environments. No. 15: 15–16.

Chawla L. (1997) Growing up in Cities: a report on research under way. Environment and Urbanization. No. 2: 247–251.

Chawla L., Malone K. (2003) Neighbourhood Quality in Children’s eyes. Children in the city. Home, neighbourhood and community. London.

Driskell D. (1998) Creating better cities with children and youth. UNESKO, Paris.

Francis M., Lorenzo R. (2002) Seven realms of children’s participation. Journal of Environmental psychology. No. 22: 157–169.

Gullо /v E., Olwig K.F. (2003) Children’s places. Cross-cultural perspectives. London: Routledge: 1–19.

Hall G.S. (1897) The Story of a Sand-Pile. New York, Chicago, E.L. Kellogg & co.

Holloway S., Valentine G. (1999) Cyberkids: Children’s Social Networks. In: Virtual Communities’ and Online Spaces. Children 5–16. Research Briefing: 1–4.

Holloway S., Valentine G. (2000) Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology. No. 34: 763–783.

Holloway S., Valentine G. (2009) Playing, Living, Learning. Children’s geographies.

Horelli L. (1998) Creating child-friendly environments: Case study on children’s participation in three European countries. Childhood. No. 5: 230–242.

James S. (1990) Is There a ‘Place’ for Children in Geography? Area. No. 22: 278–283.

Kjо /rholt A.T. (2003) «Creating a Place to Belong»: Girls’ and Boys’ Hut-building as a Site for Understanding Discourses on Childhood and Generational Relations in a Norwegian Community. Children’s Geographies. No. 1: 261–279.

Kytta M. (2004) The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. No. 24: 179–198.

Limb M., Matthews H., Taylor M. (2005) The “Street” as Third space. Childhood. Critical concepts in sociology. New York: 253–269.

Lorenzo R., Francis M. (2002) Seven realms of children’s participation. Journal of Environmental psychology. No. 22: 157–169.

Lynch K. (1977) Growing up in cities. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Matthews H. (2003) The street as a liminal space: the barbed spaces of childhood. Children in the city: 101–117.

Munthali K., Hampshire E., Porter A. (2011) Mobility, surveillance and control of children and young people in the everyday: perspectives from sub-Saharan Africa. Surveillance and society. No. 9: 114–131.

O’Keeffe B., O’Beirne A. (2014) Children’s Independent Mobility on the Island of Ireland Mary Immaculate College. Limerick.

Opie I., Opie P. (1969) Children’s games in street and playground. Oxford: University Press.

Rasmussen K., Smidt S. (2003) Children in the city. Home, neighbourhood and community. London and New York.

Satta C. (2010) Simply child’s play? Reconfiguring child-adult relations in a leisure place for children. Enfance & Cultures. Paris. [en ligne] URL: http://www.enfanceetcultures. pdf.

Schoeppe S., Tranter P., Duncan M.J., Curtis C., Carver A., Malone K. (2016) Australian children’s independent mobility levels: secondary analyses of cross-sectional data between 1991 and 2012. Children’s Geographies. No. 14: 408–421.

Shaw B., Watson B., Frauendienst B., Redecker A., Jones T., Hillma M. (2013) Children’s independent mobility: a comparative study in England and Germany (1971–2010). Policy Studies Institute, London.

Skelton T. (2009) Children’s geographies. Geographies of Children: Play, Work, Mobilities and Migration. Geography Compass. No. 3/4: 1430–1448.

Tremblay M., Gray C., Akinroye K., Harrington D., Katzmarzyk P., Lambert E., Liukkonen J., Maddison R., Ocansey R., Onywera V., Prista A., Reilly J., Marti ’nez R., Sarmiento Duenas O., Standage M., Tomkinson G. (2014) Physical Activity of Children: A Global Matrix of Grades Comparing 15 Countries. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. No. 11: 113–125.

Valentine G. (2004) Public space and the culture of childhood, Hants, Ashgate. Childhood. No. 11: 156–173.

Ward C. (1978) The child in the city. New York.

Zeiher H. (2003) Shaping daily life in urban environment. Children in the city. Home, neighbourhood and community. London and New York: 66–81.

Content No 3, 2018