Russian Society at the Beginning of the 20th and Early 21st Centuries: Problems and Risks

Russian Society at the Beginning of the 20th and Early 21st Centuries:
Problems and Risks

Pantin V.I.

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS; Head of Department for Comparative Political Studies of Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ID of the Article:

For citation:

Pantin V.I. Russian Society at the Beginning of the 20th and Early 21st Centuries: Problems and Risks. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2019. No 11. P. 120-130


The article deals with the major problems and risks of Russian society in early 20th, as well as 21st centuries. The author shows that the social crisis and 1917 revolution were caused primarily by alienation of the elite from the citizens and by loss of communications between them, as well as by public distrust to power, absence of ideology acceptable for majority of the population, and the ideological and political split of the educated social groups. The prime threats and development risks faced by modern Russian society are determined by large-scale social and political shifts generated by transition to a new technological and social paradigm. Moreover, significant risks arise from the erosion of national and cultural identities, by destructed unity of society, its value system, traditions and social norms. The author outlines three vectors of social and political activity in modern Russian society represented by various social actors. These actors barely interact with each other, creating a threat of social destabilization. It is concluded that successful adaptation to the profound changes requires to combine traditions and values that form the cultural features of a given society with social innovations. This combination ensures a successful and dynamic development of such countries as China, South Korea, Singapore, India and a number of other

social changes; values; technological structure; social structure; identity; social actors; Western countries; the Russian Federation


Acharya A. (2014) The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Akaev A., Pantin V. (2014) Technological Innovations and Future Shifts in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 58. No. 4: 867–872.

Arrighi G. (2007) Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty First Century. London; New York: Verso.

Ayvazov A.E., Belikov V.A. (2017) The Economic Prerequisites of the October 1917 Revolution. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [History and Modernity]. No. 2: 145–161. (In Russ.)

Berdyaev N.A. (2000) Russian Idea: The Main Problems of Russian Thought in the XIX Century and at the Beginning of the XX Century; Russian Fate. Moscow: Izd-vo V. Shevchuk. (In Russ.)

Drobizheva L.M. (2018) Russian Identity: Discussions in the Political Space and Dynamics of Mass Consciousness. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. No. 5: 100–115. (In Russ.)

Ferguson N. (2016) The Great Degeneration. How Institutions Decay and Economies Die. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)

Frank A.G. (1998) ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Glazyev S.Yu. (1993) Theory of Long-term Technical and Economic Development. Moscow: VlaDar. (In Russ.)

Glazyev S.Yu. (2018) A Breakthrough into the Future. Russia in the New Technological and World Economy Processes. Moscow: Knizhnyj mir. (In Russ.)

Gordon R.J. (2016) The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E. (2010) Youth of Russia: A Sociological Portrait. Moscow: TsSPiM. (In Russ.)

Grinin L.E., Korotayev A.V. (2016) Middle East, India and China in Globalization Processes. Moscow: Uchitel. (In Russ.)

Krasin Yu.A., Mihailenok O.M., Oganisyan Yu.S. (eds) (2018) October Revolution and Modernity. Social and Political Lessons. Moscow: FNISC RAN. (In Russ.)

Lapin N.I. (2015) Distances between Modernization States of Russian Regions and their Civilizational Meaning. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 5: 61–71. (In Russ.)

Lapin N.I. (2016) Atlas of Russian Modernization and Its Regions: Social and Economic and Sociocultural Tendencies and Problems. Moscow: Ves’ mir. (In Russ.)

Lapkin V.V. (2017) An Afterwоrd to the Centenary: On the Political, Legal, and the Agrarian Prerequisites of the Russian Revolution. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [History and Modernity]. No. 2: 211–246. (In Russ.)

Latov Yu.V. (2017) Phantom of «Revolutionary Situation»: The Protest Actions and the Protest Attitudes of the Russia’s Citizens. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 2: 36–51. (In Russ.)

Pantin I.K. (2015) Russian Revolution. Ideas, Ideology, Political Practice. Moscow: Letniy sad. (In Russ.)

Petukhov V.V. (2018) Dynamics of the Social Attitudes of the Russia’s Citizens and Making of a Public Demand for Change. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 40–53. (In Russ.)

Sorokin P.A. (1992) Human Being. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

Steinmetz G. (2018) Crisis of History and the History of Crisis: Historical Sociology as «Crisis Science». Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 140–143. (In Russ.)

Tikhonova N.E. (2017) Income Stratification in Russia in Comparison with Other Countries. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 3: 26–41. (In Russ.)

Tikhonova N.E. (2019) Social Policy in Modern Russia: New System Challenges. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 2: 5–18. (In Russ.)

Todd E. (2004) After the Empire. Pax Americana – Beginning of the End. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russ.)

Turchin P. (2010) The Influence of the Processes on the Middle-term Dynamics of Political Instability in the U.S. (2010–2020). Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic Strategies]. No. 5: 9–20. (In Russ.)

Content No 11, 2019