New Dimension of Social Development:
Activities and Creativity in the Internet Communications
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. firstname.lastname@example.org
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof. of the Chair of Theory and History of Sociology, St.- Petersburg State University, St.-Petersburg, Russia email@example.com
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Head of the Department of Theory and History of Sociology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
This work is supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 18-18-00132. The authors are grateful also to the Research Park of St. Petersburg State University ‘Center for Sociological and Internet Research’ for the empirical data collected (project No. 106-16435).
The article presents a study of involvement in the internet communication, activities and creativity on social networking platforms. Comparative analysis of empirical data collected in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Sverdlovsk region focuses on digital communications intensity considered an indicator of postindustrial social structures – networks and flows development. The study demonstrates sustainability and wide scope of the internet and social networking platforms usage. However the development level of such social life patterns varies in different segments of society. Social structures revealed with help of such indicators as involvement, activity and creativity in digital communications are more developed in large cities and megacities. Young people and the middle strata persons lead as groups contributing to development of network and flow structures. Communicating on social networking platforms and generating intense flows of content, members of these social groups accumulate their virtual capital. Social differentiation based on unequal distribution of virtual capital is a new form of inequality. In relation to ‘digital divide’ of the 1990s as disparities among users and nonusers this new form is a secondary digital divide for disparities among users creating digital content and users just consuming it.
Бурдье П. Формы капитала // Экономическая социология. 2002. Т. 3. № 5. С. 60–74. [Bourdieu P. (2002) Forms of Capital. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology]. Vol. 3. No. 5: 60–74. (In Russ.)]
Иванов Д.В. К теории потоковых структур // Социологические исследования. 2012. № 4. С. 8–16. [Ivanov D.V. (2012) Towards a Theory of Flow Structures. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 8–16. (In Russ.)]
Castells M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Florida R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
Knorr Cetina K. (2003) From Pipes to Scopes: The Flow Architecture of Financial Markets. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 4. No. 2: 7–23. DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2003.9672857.
Urry J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.