printDigitalization and Critical Theory of Society
Ivanov D.V.
Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Head of the Department of Theory and History of Sociology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia dvi2001@rambler.ru
Asochakov Yu.V.
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia. yasochakov@yandex.ru
This work is supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant 21-18-00125).
Rubric: Theory. Methodology
For citation:
Ivanov D.V., Asochakov Yu.V. Digitalization and Critical Theory of Society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 6. P. 16-28
Abstract
The article is presenting а critical analysis of the digitalization discourse which is reflecting not social innovations but managerial and bureaucratic appropriation of virtualization routine practices. Empirical data collected in the authors’ research show digital technologies usage turning into social routine in the Russian largest cities of Moscow and St. Petersburg. For a full revealing contradictions and true direction of digitalization, development of critical theory of society is proposed as continuation of the dialectical line of the Frankfurt School neo-Marxism evolution. The totality of domination structures and social control forms in postindustrial society is analyzed on the basis of algorithmic rationality conception introduced by the authors. Algorithmic rationality has replaced technological rationality of the late industrial age. Post-virtualization tendencies and micromovements in everyday life are considered to be an authenticity revolt against total digitalization / coercive virtualization of social life. That authenticity revolt is interpreted as an emancipation potential and escape from the algorithmic rationality realm.
Keywords
digitalization; critical theory; algorithmic rationality; post-virtualization
References
Adorno T., Horkheimer M. (1947) Dialektik der Aufklärung. Amsterdam: Querido Verlag.
Balchindorzhieva O.B., Zolkhoeva M.V. (2022) Digital Culture vs Cultural Originality (From the Experience of Preserving Chinese Cultural Identity). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 90–97. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016858-6. (In Russ.)
Baudrillard J. (1981) Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Galilée.
Berry D. (2014) Critical Theory and the Digital. London: Bloomsbury.
Berry D. (2015) Postdigital Constellation. In: Postdigital Aesthetics. Art, Computation and Design. Ed. by D. Berry and M. Dieter. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 44–57.
Bilić P. (2018) A Critique of the Political Economy of Algorithms: A Brief History of Google’s Technological Rationality. TripleC. 16(1): 315–331.
Bühl A. (1997) Die virtuelle Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Castells M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Davydova A.M., Solyanova M.A., Sorensen K. (2021) Disciplinary Digital Self-Tracking Practices: Between Emancipation and Control. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1: 217–240. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1797. (In Russ.)
Delanty G., Harris N. (2021) Critical theory and the question of technology: The Frankfurt School revisited.Thesis Eleven. 166(1): 88–108.
van Dijck J., Nieborg D. (2009) Wikinomics and Its Discontents: a Critical Analysis of Web 2.0 Business Manifestos. New Media & Society. 11(4): 855–874.
Fisher E. (2010) Contemporary Technology Discourse and the Legitimation of Capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory. 13(2): 229–252.
Fuchs C. (2014) Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
Fuchs C. (2016) Critical Theory of Communication. New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet. London: University of Westminster Press.
Fuchs C., Sevignani S. (2013) What is Digital Labour? What is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And why do these Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media? TripleC. 11(2): 237–293.\
Grigoreva E.A. (2022) Digital Inequalities: Causes. Forms, Consequences. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 161–163. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250017771-1. (In Russ.)
Hassan R. (2020) The Condition of Digitality. A Post-Modern Marxism for the Practice of Digital Life. London: University of Westminster Press.
Horkheimer M. (1937) Traditionelle und kritische Theorie. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. 6 (2): 245–294.
Ivanov D.V. (2000) Virtualization of Society. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie. (In Russ.)
Kravchenko S.A. (2022) The Ambivalences of Digitalization: The Demand of its National Cultural Model for Sustainable Development. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No: 9: 29–37. DOI:10.31857/S013216250020181-2. (In Russ.)
Marcuse H. (1937) Philosophie und kritische Theorie. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. No. 6 (3): 625–647.
Marcuse H. (1964) One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon.
Selwyn N. (2019) What is Digital Sociology? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Sharma P., Dash B. (2022) The Digital Carbon Footprint: Threat to an Environmentally Sustainable Future. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology. 14(3): 19–29.
Shpakova R.P., ed. (2003) German Sociology. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Smirnov A.V. Russian Sociology in the Context of Society Digitalization: Results of the Corpus Analysis of Scientific Texts. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 39–50. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022128-3. (In Russ.)
Tapscott D. (1995) The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tavokin E.P. (2019) Artificiality of the «Artificial Sociality». Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 115–122. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005488-9. (In Russ.)
Content No 6, 2023