Basic Human Values and Practics of Social Participation in Russia
Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Deputy Head, Ronald F. Inglehart Laboratory for Comparative Social Research (LCSR), National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia.; Scientific Editor, Department of Publishing Programs, VCIOM, Moscow, Russia firstname.lastname@example.org
Junior Researcher, Ronald F. Inglehart Laboratory for Comparative Social Research (LCSR), National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia. email@example.com
The article was prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program.
This study aims to explore to what extent values determine informal social engagement in comparison to the effects of other factors. A heterogeneous sample of respondents from an online panel (N = 3711) is used for our analyses. Self-report in terms of two types of activity, utilitarian and sociotropic, respondents engaged in the last three years were used to create a typology of social participants using latent class analysis. The results of multinomial regression modeling using the obtained classes allow us to conclude that values have a significant impact on the likelihood of more active participation in initiatives for the benefit of society as a whole or its specific groups, and their effect often exceeds the effects of other predictors, including trust, identity, life satisfaction, religiosity, and socio-demographic characteristics. At the same time, activists who approach social participation from a predominantly utilitarian perspective prioritize “Self-enhancement”, while the participants whose social activity is not limited by the interests of narrow circle, put more value on “Self-transcendence”. Other values did not have a significant impact on the engagement pattern. The paper concludes with a discussion of the limitations of the study and directions for future work.
Almakaeva A.M., Mavletova A.M. (2018) Modernization process in Russia: Can we expect the shift to emancipative values? Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie I sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 6 (148): 91–112. (In Russ.)
Arieli S., Grant A.M., Sagiv L. (2014) Convincing yourself to care about others: An intervention for enhancing benevolence values. Journal of Personality. No. 82 (1): 15–24.
Christoforou A. (2011) Social Capital Across European Countries: Individual and Aggregate Determinants of Group Membership: Social Capital Across European Countries. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. No. 70 (3): 699–728.
Davidov E. (2010) Testing for comparability of human values across countries and time with the third round of the European Social Survey. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. No. 51 (3): 171–191.
Demirel Y., Sadykova G.F. (2018) The Impact of Social Support on Citizenship Behavior. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 81–86. (In Russ.)
Efremova M., Bultseva M. (2020) The relationship between individual values and prosocial behavior in online and offline contexts. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society]. No. 11 (1): 107–126. (In Russ.)
Granovetter M.S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties American Journal of Sociology. No. 78 (6): 1360–1380.
Hagenaars J.A., McCutcheon A.L. (2002) Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press.
Knack S., Keefer P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly journal of economics. No. 112 (4): 1251–1288.
Kuznetsov I.M. Values and socio-political attitudes in contemporary Russia. (2017) Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 47–55. (In Russ.)
Linzer D., Lewis J. (2011) poLCA: An R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011. No. 42 (10): 1–29.
Magun V.S., Rudnev M.G., Schmidt P. (2015) European Value Typology and Basic Values of Russians. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [Bulletin of Public Opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. No. 121 (3–4): 74–93. (In Russ.)
McFarland S., Webb M., Brown D. (2012) All humanity is my ingroup: a measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of personality and social psychology. No. 103 (5): 830–853.
Mersiyanova I., Korneeva I. (2015) “City silence” in Moscow: prerequisites and public involvement in civil society practices. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [Bulletin of Public Opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. No. 6 (130): 48–65. (In Russ.)
Oishi S. et al. (2007) The socioecological model of procommunity action: the benefits of residential stability. Journal of personality and social psychology. No. 93 (5): 831.
van Oorschot W., Arts W., Gelissen J. (2006) Social Capital in Europe: Measurement and Social and Regional Distribution of a Multifaceted Phenomenon. Acta Sociologica. 49 (2): 149–167.
Omelchenko D.A., Maksimova S.G., Noyanzina O.E. et al. (2016) Social capital, trust and civil participation of modern Russian youth. Politika i obshhestvo [Politics and Society]. No. 8 (140): 1124–1135. (In Russ.)
Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. (1992) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.
Sedova N.N. (2014) Сivic activism in modern Russia: forms, factors, and social base. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No. 2: 48–71. (In Russ.)
Skalaban I. (2011) Social, Public and Civic Participation: To the Problem of. Understanding Concepts. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. No. 1 (13): 130–139. (In Russ.)
Shamionov R., Bocharova E., Nevsky E. (2022) The Role of Values in the Commitment of Young People to Various Types of Social Activity. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social psychology and society]. No. 13 (1): 124–141. (In Russ.)
Schwartz S.H. (2016). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. In: Brosch T., Sander D. (eds) Handbook of value: Perspectives from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology and sociology. New York: Oxford University Press: 63–84.
Schwartz S., Butenko T.P., Sedova D.S., Lipatova A.S. (2012) A Refined Theory of Basic Personal Values: Validation in Russia. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki [The Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics]. Vol. 9. No. 2: 43–70. (In Russ.)
Schwartz S.H. (2010) Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In: Mikulincer M.,
Shaver P.R. (eds) Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington: American Psychological Association: 221–241.
Schwartz S.H. (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology. No. 25 (1): 1–65.
Titov A., Lepshokova Z. (2020) Individual values of entrepreneurs as predictors of their planned charitable behavior. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology]. No. 10 (3): 140–163. (In Russ.)
Venables W., Ripley B. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer.
Welzel C., Inglehart R., Deutsch F. (2005) Social capital, voluntary associations and collective action: which aspects of social capital have the greatest ‘civic’ payoff? Journal of civil society. No. 1 (2): 121–146.