printAfter the “End of History”:
Progressive Alternatives to the Refeudalization and “Techno-Socialism”
Buzgalin A.V.
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor of the Faculty of Economics, Director of the Centre for Contemporary Marxist Studies, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow buzgalin@mail.ru
Rubric: In memoriam
For citation:
Buzgalin A.V. After the “End of History”: Progressive Alternatives to the Refeudalization and “Techno-Socialism”. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2023. No 11. P. 163-172
Abstract
The article continues the author’s publications in the journal “Sociological Studies”, in which it was shown that contradictions of the neoliberal model of late capitalism pose a threat of the society involution towards conservative liberalism and refeudalization. The new text demonstrates a possibile implementing of a progressive alternative to this trend and criticizes currently popular idea of “technosocialism”. The author argues that the developing relations of transit to the “kingdom of freedom” in the space of late capitalism presupposes (1) the active regulation of social reproduction in order to effect a transition from the orientation of socio-economic development to profit and GDP growth to eco-socio-humanitarian priorities; (2) reforming property relations in the direction of socialization; (3) redistributing part of the parasitically used excess incomes by simulacra people (rentiers, financiers, show business persons, professional sports stars, etc.) for the purposes of social development and (4) the progress from manipulated democracy to dialectical unity of civil society and essential democracy. The subject of these changes – a kind of “progressor” – can become a union of creative workers of the public sector (“socialists”) with highly professional industrial proletariat realizing their strategic interests politically and ideologically.
Keywords
“the end of history”; late capitalism; neoliberalism; conservatism; refeudalization; “realm of freedom”; post-capitalism; socialiat
References
A(O)nthology of Noonomy: the Fourth Technological Revolution and Its Economic, Social and Humanitarian Consequences. (2021) Ed. by S.D. Bodrunov. Saint-Petersburg: INID. (In Russ.)
Bulavka-Buzgalina L.A. Marx XXI. (2018) Social progress and its price. The dialectic of alienation and de alienation. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy. No. 5: 73–84. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V. (2018) Time for alternatives. Alternatives. No. 2: 5–46. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V. (2018a) Man in a world of alienation: towards a critique of liberalism and conservatism. Reactualization of the Marxist heritage. Questions of Philosophy. No. 6: 155–166. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V. (2023) After the “end of history”: conservative neoliberalism and refeudalization? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 133–144. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2015) Global capital. 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Theory: the Global Hegemony of Capital and Its Limits («Capital» Re-loaded). 3 ed. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2019) Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism: from Proletariat and Bourgeoisie Towards Precariat and Creative Class? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 18–28. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2022) Capitalism, Post-Capitalism and the Creative Revolution (critical reflections on the article by D.A. Davydov). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 100–109. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin A.V., Yakovleva N.G., Barashkova O.V. (2023) Human being, human potential, “human capital” in the mirror of political economy. Russian Economic Journal. No. 1: 4–21. (In Russ.)
Chen Hong, Barashkova O.V. Post-Capitalism or Socialism? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 116–121. (In Russ.)
King B., Petty R. (2021) The Rise of Technosocialism: How Inequality, AI and Climate Will Usher in a New World. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
Kleyner G.B. (2021) System-oriented planning: Russia, 21st century. Problems in Political Economy. No. 2: 45–56. (In Russ.)
Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. The New Press.
Tenyakov I.M. (2016). Approaches to the Evaluation of the Quality of Economic Growth. Problems in Political Economy. No. 4: 61–73. (In Russ.).
Yakovleva N.G. (2018) Education in Russia: public good or commercial service? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 149–153. (In Russ.)
Yakovleva N.G. (2022) What Sprouts of Post-Capitalism are Capable of Ensuring Progress of Human Potential and Technological Modernization? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2022. No. 9: 110–115. (In Russ.)
Content No 11, 2023